Results 1 to 20 of 34

Thread: WE MADE TARGET WHP!!!! (almost...)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,106

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeremy Billiel View Post
    40% engine multiplier coming soon! LOL
    as i recall, the assumed mulitplier for the ITA honda is already over 40%.

    that is, if you take the weight and work backwards, you end up in the 42-44% range, iirc.
    1985 CRX Si competed in Solo II: AS, CS, DS, GS
    1986 CRX Si competed in: SCCA Solo II CSP, SCCA ITA, SCCA ITB, NASA H5
    1988 CRX Si competed in ITA & STL

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Sunnyside, NY
    Posts
    1,197

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tom91ita View Post
    as i recall, the assumed mulitplier for the ITA honda is already over 40%.

    that is, if you take the weight and work backwards, you end up in the 42-44% range, iirc.
    I believe 38% for the CRX si D16a6 engine. For the D16z6 (and probably the other VTEC D16's unless in IT it's 25% and for good reason... I have a 10/10th build and I am more or less there, within +/- 1 whp depending on the day, the dyno settings, etc.

    Here's the math.

    2270 lbs (process weight) - 50 lbs DW adder = 2220 lbs
    2220 lbs / 0.98 FWD subractor = 2265 lbs (if unadjusted)
    2265 lbs / 14.5 lb/chp ratio = 156.2 chp
    156.2chp * 0.85 standard driveline ratio loss = 132.7 process whp

    OR

    156.2 chp - 125 stock chp = 31.2 chp upgrade via IT allowed mods
    31.2 chp / 125 stock chp = 24.96% or ~ 25%
    Demetrius Mossaidis aka 'Mickey' #12 ITA NESCCA
    '92 Honda Civic Si
    STFU and "Then write a letter. www.crbscca.com"
    2013 ITA NARRC Champion and I have not raced since.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,106

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mossaidis View Post
    I believe 38% for the CRX si D16a6 engine. For the D16z6 (and probably the other VTEC D16's unless in IT it's 25% and for good reason... I have a 10/10th build and I am more or less there, within +/- 1 whp depending on the day, the dyno settings, etc.

    Here's the math.

    2270 lbs (process weight) - 50 lbs DW adder = 2220 lbs
    2220 lbs / 0.98 FWD subractor = 2265 lbs (if unadjusted)
    2265 lbs / 14.5 lb/chp ratio = 156.2 chp
    156.2chp * 0.85 standard driveline ratio loss = 132.7 process whp

    OR

    156.2 chp - 125 stock chp = 31.2 chp upgrade via IT allowed mods
    31.2 chp / 125 stock chp = 24.96% or ~ 25%
    i'll accept your math above that is saying 156.2 Crank HP. but since the 90-91's were rated at 108 hp, then 156.2/108 = 1.446

    so call it a 45% multiplier.

    nice hp numbers btw. and thanks for sharing.
    1985 CRX Si competed in Solo II: AS, CS, DS, GS
    1986 CRX Si competed in: SCCA Solo II CSP, SCCA ITA, SCCA ITB, NASA H5
    1988 CRX Si competed in ITA & STL

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Sunnyside, NY
    Posts
    1,197

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tom91ita View Post
    i'll accept your math above that is saying 156.2 Crank HP. but since the 90-91's were rated at 108 hp, then 156.2/108 = 1.446

    so call it a 45% multiplier.

    nice hp numbers btw. and thanks for sharing.
    Tom, those numbers were posted selfishly for my car. Here is the 90-91 Civic/CRX Si/Ex as far as I know it.

    2250 lbs (process weight) - 50 lbs DW adder = 2200 lbs
    2200 lbs / 0.98 FWD subractor = 2244 lbs (if unadjusted)
    2244 lbs / 14.5 lb/chp ratio = 154.8 chp
    154.8 chp * 0.85 standard driveline ratio loss = 131.6 process whp

    OR

    154.8 chp - 108 stock chp = 46.8 chp upgrade via IT allowed mods
    46.8 chp / 108 stock chp = 43.3% or ~ 43%

    wow, that's crazy though there's probably more weight adders that I am NOT aware of. It's been posted on it.com before lots of time, it was well know that the Honda advertised lower than real chp for the D16a6.

    there was a guy that knows a guy that said his CRX Si "did 135whp but on a Dynojet". That second guy was not Moser but another well respected CRX dude. if unaltered that dynojet posted 10% higher than real whp, then perhaps 122whp, about 9 whp below target. My suggestion is to talk to Moser or King Motorsports to see how much they were off the mark. Otherwise, I would call that extra 150 lbs "reward weight" for driving a d16a6. (sorry)
    Last edited by mossaidis; 06-11-2011 at 09:03 AM.
    Demetrius Mossaidis aka 'Mickey' #12 ITA NESCCA
    '92 Honda Civic Si
    STFU and "Then write a letter. www.crbscca.com"
    2013 ITA NARRC Champion and I have not raced since.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •