Travis, I agree with you on just allowing substitute engine mounts helping FWD cars more than RWD, which have driveline components the length of the car. However, I've always thought there was a creative, and legal, argument for changing diff and tranny mounts.
Here is the GCR definiton of subframe:
Sub-frame/Cross Member –
A component attached to the frame or structure
of a car in order to augment its strength while at the same time
serving as a platform for mounting suspension and drive train components.
And then here is the ITCS on bushings:
Bushing material, including that used to mount a suspension
subframe to the chassis, is unrestricted. This includes
the use of spherical bearings, so long as no suspension
component is modified to facilitate their installation. Retention
of spherical bearings by use of tack welds is allowed,
as long as the welds serve no other purpose.
On the TR8, the tranny bushing is held to the tranny, and then the body by a 10" or so long bar of metal that certainly seems to qualify as a "subframe" under the definition. I think that bushing is already free then under the rules.
For the diff, well, it's a live rear, so it is a suspension component and bushings are free.
On the 260z, the diff is held in place by some crazy bars and such (the "mustache" bar) that look like subframes under the rule to me, meaning the bushings are free.
So, basically, so long as the tranny/diff is being held in place by a separate piece of metal of some sort, I think you have a subframe and the bushings are free. Only those cars in whihc the tranny or diff bolts directly to the chassis would there be an issue.
Bookmarks