Do you mean the CRB looks at displacement, or that under the Process, we did not?

I agree that at this point, yes, displacement is considered in classification decisions. It is considered "architecture" for one. Two, a specific example is teh 528e which was deemed to simply have too large of a motor for ITB.

I disagree with all of that, but it is the decision of the committee and the CRB. I personally do not think displacement is relevant (Andy's 2.0 SE-R motor to S2000 motor comparo is spot on) and is already accounted for via the torque modifier anyway. I also think that no car has "too big" or "too small" a motor for a particular class. Process it, and see where it fits best weight wise - heavy in the lower class, or lighter in the higher one.

Quote Originally Posted by Andy Bettencourt View Post
I am going to disagree on principle. It may not be a consideration in a new classification, but it is when cars are looked at for review. So by default, it is a factor the CRB uses when refusing to 'Process' legacy cars, no?