There were people on the NARRC committee that would always push for the "all races count"
I would always argue against.
Towards the end, oh wait, did I say end??, I was able to win out and have throwaways.
There were people on the NARRC committee that would always push for the "all races count"
I would always argue against.
Towards the end, oh wait, did I say end??, I was able to win out and have throwaways.
Jerry
NER South
I think the biggest challenge is we have too many events and tracks luring entrants, which is a good problem to have. If someone doesn't like one track, why go there just for a "championship" when they have another more attractive option to them on the same weekend? I think a series works much better in geographic areas where there is one primary track, then they dabble in a couple others such as done in the WDCR.
Maybe there's a way to make it more attractive to people; just not sure how.
Dave Gran
Real Roads, Real Car Guys – Real World Road Tests
Go Ahead - Take the Wheel's Free Guide to Racing
me too but just one throwaway. Granted my NARRC win has in 2013 and NARRC ITA has been was on the slow decline for while, so basically I have lots more room for improvement. Anyways, I checked with the past ITA NARRC wins before 2013 and overall, regardless of rules variation, to win NARRC on average you needed to finish top 3 in every race. Since participation was lower in 2013, I clinched ITA before NARRCoffs. My point, NARRC points rules worked well, at least in ITA. It rewarded commitment, reliability and you had a strong chance if you had a top 3 finish at every race.
Demetrius Mossaidis aka 'Mickey' #12 ITA NESCCA
'92 Honda Civic Si
STFU and "Then write a letter. www.crbscca.com"
2013 ITA NARRC Champion and I have not raced since.
Bookmarks