'96 Civic CX HB

[Knestis]

First question is how (or if) the CX is any different than a DX, in terms of what we care about for classing/spec'ing in IT.

Second would be either asking for the CX to be listed (if it is substantively different) OR worrying about whether the DX is listed - or listed correctly. Any or all of these things could be initiated by a letter to the club racing office with SPECIFIC requests to do what you want done. This really needs to be accompanied by documentation sufficient for the ITAC to make a decision, including all of the kinds of information you see in the ITCS, explanations of changes during the generation production run, comparisons with similar/related models, etc.

K

[jimmyc]

First question is how (or if) the CX is any different than a DX, in terms of what we care about for classing/spec'ing in IT.

K

for 96-00 EK hatchbacks, the CX and DX are "trim level changes".

Things like, AC, PS, and other little things maybe even the rear wiper.

The motor is the exact same, along with the trans, brakes, suspension, chassis.

[CRallo]

for 96-00 EK hatchbacks, the CX and DX are "trim level changes".

Things like, AC, PS, and other little things maybe even the rear wiper.

The motor is the exact same, along with the trans, brakes, suspension, chassis.

well that would make life a bit easier...

[ITC Racer]

I think this would be a good car for ITA or perhaps ITB- depending on how light it could be made. Specs at first glance appear similar to 88-91 CRX Si

[jimmyc]

I think this would be a good car for ITA or perhaps ITB- depending on how light it could be made. Specs at first glance appear similar to 88-91 CRX Si

accept that car is an anomaly, as it was HEAVILY underrate from the factory.

[Knestis]

I don't have my info with me right now but I think that the DX of that generation (or maybe the '92-95 version?) is currently on the ITAC list-of-things-to-look-at. If someone would provide documentation via...

crb@scca.com

...we could maybe fix the CX situation at the same time.

K

[ekim952522000]

I don't have my info with me right now but I think that the DX of that generation (or maybe the '92-95 version?) is currently on the ITAC list-of-things-to-look-at. If someone would provide documentation via...

crb@scca.com

...we could maybe fix the CX situation at the same time.

K

I submitted the 92-95 DX to be moved to ITB, I was waiting until I find the results of that before I submit the 96-00 for ITB.