I'm playing Devil's Advocate here, not intending to pick on you. I agree with what you're suggesting, but...
>>> original angular orientation and the bellhousing plane can be part of the VTS requirements.
There are no VTS for cars in Super Touring U and L. Anything can run in that class with the appropriate engine. And there won't be any VTS for engines except non-US market engines.
>>> make a specific year range and model of car(s) part of the alternative engine allowance.
Unfortunately, that's cat's long out of the bag, unlikely to be further restricted. But to do so would require a wholesale change in the philosophy, in addition to having to specifically approve each and every possible combination, immediately making any swap non-compliant until the STAC/CRB goes through the process of approving them. And given our slow lead times (request ->STAC ->CRB -> Fastrack) we'd be holding people up until we did.
It'll probably bite us in the ass eventually, but I just can't see moving from an "open" philosophy to a "permitted only".
>>> BTW, are shift linkage / trans housing modifications legal to allow for swaps?
Can't say for sure without specifics - and it's not really mine to say - but I would suggest it's compliant to change a car from cable to rod or hydraulic shift, if that's what the desired trans used.
>>> AND of the car as a whole allowing the chassis to be set lower without CV axle bind and better weight balance...
Note ST classes each have minimum ride height.
GA
Bookmarks