Results 1 to 20 of 47

Thread: 2009 MARRS Format - speak up now or live with it

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Fredericksburg, VA
    Posts
    1,191

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jjjanos View Post
    I do not believe that anyone suggested that each class receive its own start. The idea that newcomers be split from oldtimers in each group is what I think people are suggesting. E.g. SRF from the rest of Prod. ITA from SRX7, etc.

    IT7/ITB/ITC/SS are doing a single start.
    Jeff - I sincerely hope the decision not to split this group was based on driver's input, and was not something done purely out of spite. It seems to me splitting IT7/SSB from ITB/ITC/SSC would have been an easy decision, and would have kept the front-runners in the first group from ever seeing the front-runners in the second. The top 3-4 IT7 cars (out of the 5-6 that usually run) consistently run as fast or faster than the top ITB cars; and SSB actually should be the fastest class in that group. And with the small number of IT7/SSB entries we usually get that would have meant the ITB drivers would have had to contend with only a very few, well-spaced backmarkers from the first group - essentially giving them their own race. But, that's just my take.
    Last edited by erlrich; 02-09-2009 at 04:31 PM.
    Earl R.
    240SX
    ITA/ST5

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    907

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by erlrich View Post
    Jeff - I sincerely hope the decision not to split this group was based on driver's input, and was not something done purely out of spite.
    AFAIK, we did the same thing all of the DRs did. We had a short break-out session and made a decision whether it was needed.

    I don't know which groups specifically requested split starts. I just know IT7/ITB/ITC/SS did not request it.

  3. #3

    Default

    In regards to split starts, initially each group was asked to decide what they wanted for the upcoming season. Some groups knew what they wanted. Some were rather undecided. Some classes within groups disagreed. I suggested that the sups be phrased "Split Starts to be used as needed" and I believe this is what Gayle accepted.

    There was no need to lock ourselves into or out of Split Starts at this point, as long as the stewards are accommodating. I believe a suitable understanding with the stewards was reached.

    I really don't think that the ITB, IT7 etc group will need one, but I'm going to let your next driver rep work that out.

    Charlie

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •