Results 1 to 20 of 21

Thread: April 2009 Fastrack

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default April Fastrack.

    I see that we are now allowed to remove vent windows:

    MOTION: Effective 4/1/09.
    Add to 9.1.2.D.9.i, “The complete duct assembly in the plane of the window shall be no larger than 100 square inches.”
    Add to 9.1.3.D.9.m, “If equipped, the vent window and its supporting structure may be removed.”
    PASSED, Christian No, Sheridan Abstain

    Since we are allowed to add ducting, does that mean I can replace the vent window with a cooling duct?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Palm Beach, FL
    Posts
    132

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jthomps348176 View Post
    Add to 9.1.2.D.9.i, “The complete duct assembly in the plane of the window shall be no larger than 100 square inches.”
    Per side?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,499

    Default

    100 Sq. Inches per duct is the way I read it.... Hmmmm so if I wanted to duct air to me, my camera, my back seat ect can I stick a bunch of ducts in my drivers window to improve aero.. I mean improve cooling. My answer is simply NO. I think (Which is just my interpretation) is that I could put a duct in both windows (Passenger side and Drivers side) as long as each one didn't exceed the 100 Sq. inch limitations. I don't see a reason to have multiple air ducts in 1 window...

    Stephen

    I will probably never have any ducts. Being here in the North East we seldomly need that extra cooling Besides I don't want anything else that could potentially come in towards me in an accident that isn't either on the other side of a body panel or my window net!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Santa Clara, CA
    Posts
    39

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StephenB View Post
    100 Sq. Inches per duct is the way I read it.... Hmmmm so if I wanted to duct air to me, my camera, my back seat ect can I stick a bunch of ducts in my drivers window to improve aero.. I mean improve cooling.
    How would that not be considered "strained or tortured interpretation"?
    Viet-Tam Luu (a.k.a. "Tam")
    Director, SCCA San Francisco Region
    2011 SFR-SCCA ITS Champion
    #12 ITS (1999 Mazda MX-5 Miata)
    #12 STU (2003 Mitsubishi Evo 8)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,499

    Default

    I agree that the example I gave is NOT allowed because it says the complete duct assembly. This is why in my next sentence I said "My answer is simply NO" I think the interpertation part comes into play when someone asks at what point are they considerate seperate ducting assemblies. Some may argue when they are sperated in two different windows, or 2 seperate sides of the car, others may argue that each duct that serves a different function would be considered a different assembly. I only mention this because I think that the intention`(in my opinion and I am NOT on any rules boards) was one duct per window since it does say "in THE plane of the window".

    So to make it clear.. my interpretation is that I DO think that you can have one on each side of the car. up to 100sq inches each, or mulitple ducts in 1 window plane not to exceed a total of 100 sq. inches.

    (The previous post had asked if it was per side.)

    Stephen

    Sorry for the confusion

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    NH, US
    Posts
    3,821

    Default

    I put in a few requests, and was hoping to see them in the April Fasttrack, but they did not arrive, however I did see a whole new look! It is good to see that major problems have been recognized and we are now seeing some changes.

    I have to say I like the change! Not only have I recieved follow-up e-mails discussing the requests but also additional ones telling me that they are still in process and are continuing to review the requests. The other day I also recieved a call from Kevin (not sure who he is) to tell me that I might not see the results in the next Fasttrack as they are making several changes (To IT???) and thus things are a bit busy. While I would really like to see my specific needs fixed I can wait, especially because I can personaly see the start of some good changes!

    Thanks to those making it happen;

    Raymond
    RST Performance Racing
    www.rstperformance.com

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Black Rock, Ct
    Posts
    9,594

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RSTPerformance View Post
    Not only have I recieved follow-up e-mails discussing the requests but also additional ones telling me that they are still in process and are continuing to review the requests. The other day I also recieved a call from Kevin (not sure who he is) to tell me that I might not see the results in the next Fasttrack as they are making several changes (To IT???) and thus things are a bit busy.
    Raymond
    Kevin is new. He replaces Jeremy, who has moved up the ladder, I think.

    He's right..we're taking a month or two to do some big picture housecleaning and stabilizing of our foundation.

    ITB is needing lots of attention, and some cars need lots of weight. Torque is a big issue, we're figuring out how to slap them with some major poundage.
    Jake Gulick


    CarriageHouse Motorsports
    for sale: 2003 Audi A4 Quattro, clean, serviced, dark green, auto, sunroof, tan leather with 75K miles.
    IT-7 #57 RX-7 race car
    Porsche 1973 911E street/fun car
    BMW 2003 M3 cab, sun car.
    GMC Sierra Tow Vehicle
    New England Region
    lateapex911(at)gmail(dot)com


Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •