Interesting. So you don't really think testsled results run by Delphi (et al) engineers are valid?
Honestly, its worrisome that a CRB member will be guiding the decision based on his feelings, when empirical data exists.
As for your question regarding why we need and accet the mandating of belts and helmets...please, at least bring relevant comparisons to the conversation.
I am not limited in my choice of belts to one obviously flawed standard. Lets face it, EVERYone knows that HANS wrote the SFI 38.1 standard, and did it in a restrictive manner with aspects that don't do anything but dampen innovation, regardless of performance potential. And the Snell foundation runs its business in an entirely different manner. You're comparing apples to rotten tomatoes Jim.
Bookmarks