View Poll Results: Should non-USDM motors be allowed in ST?

Voters
60. You may not vote on this poll
  • NO - USDM only

    23 38.33%
  • YES

    30 50.00%
  • Allow on a case by case basis

    7 11.67%
Results 1 to 20 of 112

Thread: Should NON-US motors be allowed in ST?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    Yes. The big first assumptions of the class - as I understand them - would be in no way compromised by this approach.

    K

    ON EDIT - My answer might be different for STU vs STL.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    I said no. What problem is this 'solution' fixing? I am not sure any. Are you opening up a market of engines that will equalize the power/cc issue?

    Is it neccessary? What beneifts does it provide? Does it have the same effect for all manufacturers or just the ones 'you' (the collective you) like?

    For a rule change like this, I like to hear WHY, instead of WHY NOT. (Looking at this from an STL point of view)
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    E. Windsor N.J. USA
    Posts
    107

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andy Bettencourt View Post
    For a rule change like this, I like to hear WHY
    First, I'm not an expert. And second, I'm only concerned with Hondas. Plus, I'm certainly biased a little.

    That said.

    Why not?

    The K20a and K20a2 are almost identical. Most of the parts can be mixed and matched. Same with much of the B series stuff. One could build a JDM spec K20a engine using a K20a2 US block and few (if any) would know any better...

    That's what I'd do...

    Policing would be a B-itch.
    #88 STU Exedy Acura Integra Type-R
    #04 STU DBA Acura RSX (2010 ARRC STU Champion)

    HRE Wheels - Exedy - Hooiser - Carbotech - DBA - Hondaworks- Motovicity

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Houston-ish
    Posts
    932

    Default

    I bet if I stuck an SR20DE in my 240SX, I could go all season locally without anybody even batting an eye. Why? Cause it says Nissan on the valve cover and it bolts in stock. (The car came with this engine in every other country it was sold.) I can provide a bazillion pictures of this engine in this chassis, including a service manual in Engrish with drawings of this engine in the chassis and everything.

    The guys in tech can't possibly know every car and every US engine that's on the market, so it's nearly impossible to police this kind of stuff.

    I haven't been asked to lift my hood by anyone since I got my logbook for the car back in May. Of course I've only run regionals so far, but it's not like I'm an also-ran. I've finished in the top 5 overall and won STU in all but one race to date, as well as set track record at MSR-Houston.
    Nonetheless, I could have been running a freakin Chevy V8 in the car all season and nobody would know..

    But am I for non-US engines? HELL YES. Nissan's engine options under 3L are crapola for the US. everything is a long-stroke truck engine, or an ancient iron block designed in the 60s. for a supposedly modern class and philosophy, Nissan is stuck with engines from the stone ages.

    Do I realize it would open up the class to all kinds of other uber-engines? You betcha. Bring 'em on.

    Let's go back to the rules when they were originally made for the class: (This is STU-specific..)

    Normally aspirated:
    Under 3.0L displacement
    12.0:1 max compression
    0.6" max valve lift
    6 spd max transmission.
    weight = 1.1lb / cc displacement
    Go.

    Turbo?
    stock turbo for the engine it came on. no conversions.
    pick a tranny, 6 spds max.
    weight is based on inlet restrictor size placed in turbo.
    Go.

    For whatever engine you have, you must a factory service manual in English in your possession.

    Very simple to police. All of the components are easy to measure and/or verify with a factory manual. Voila.
    Last edited by Matt93SE; 02-08-2011 at 11:43 PM.
    Houston Region
    STU Nissan 240SX
    EProd RX7

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    Policing is 100% moot. Tech has NOTHING to do with legality. There is no difference between STx with non USDM stuff and IT right now. It's up to the competitors to know their competition. It's also a punk move to run something illegal like that. You want your ashtray that bad? Please.

    Not 'why not'. WHY? The first real reason I heard was to provide a selection that was much better suited to 'racing'. I'll buy that some.

    Mostly I just see it as providing SOME a better choice and not all. I like rules that help or hurt everyone.
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Houston-ish
    Posts
    932

    Default

    Dont' have a coronary over there-- just voicing my opinion here. We're all allowed to do that, no?

    The only time I've lifted the hood on my car at the track is to check the fluids. nobody has looked under my hood or even asked. If they did, I've got nothing to hide. My car is 100% within the rules and I plan to keep it that way, competitive or not.

    If I were the cheating type, it would be easy to do and not get caught- at least for a while.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •