Results 1 to 20 of 116

Thread: STL - what's going to be hot?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Greg Amy View Post
    Call the class whatever you want, but in the end the rules are plainly right out there for everyone to choose. Members can take it, or leave it.
    And I have never said otherwise, nor have I campaigned to have any adjustments made to any one car. What I have done is made suggestions (13-bee) that may allow for some diversity in a very popular chassis. Thinking about the CLASS's success.

    As to the black helicopter rhetoric, of course not. But just be careful when you post stuff like this because it, right, or wrong, adds to your Miata mystique.

    I'm really sorry that Mazda doesn't make BSHP (hp/cc) as good as others do, but maybe you should direct such misplaced ire at them instead? GOD FORBID we have a class in this club where the Miata isn't a dominant car..."just sayin"...
    Especially when there was NO mention of the Miata prior to you typing it. You have a very thick skin, but lets try and see the classes critisism for what it is.

    Listen, I think it's very fair that many are worried about the success of the class given the amount of cars that people perceive to be capable of competing. No more and no less from me.
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Houston-ish
    Posts
    932

    Default

    Oh I'm still running (In STU, with a 130k mile stock engine). I'm just waiting on STU and STL to figure out what they're going to do before I dump any cash into the car.
    If the SR20DET is allowed, then I may go that way. Otherwise it's dump $10k into a KA to get the same power I can by dropping in an SR w/ appropriate inlet restrictor for $2500.

    If they don't allow the SR20DET, then I'll see about an SR20DE (non turbo version) and run in STL. problem there is I've already got the bigger brakes and a few other minor things that would have to go away. I'd spend money to go slower. not what I want.

    I'm sitting with money in the bank to buy the engine, dog box, and aero. But I'm not spending a penny until STAC makes up their mind what they're going to do. I'm not willing to throw $15k in the trash.


    On the brakes note..
    Front Hawk HT-10 for Wilwood Dynalite= $59. They last me a season. $85 2-pc Coleman rotors have been on for 2 seasons and still have lots of life left. custom machined hats cost me $100 each at a local fab shop. Caliper mounting bracket took me a couple hours in the garage with a drill press, digital calipers, and a sharpie.

    Total investment in TONS of front brake: $725. that's for rotors, pads, calipers, hardware, brake lines, everything. My expendables are now under $150 per year.

    Hawk HT-10 brake pads to fit 300ZX rear (2 piston) calipers. $120 a set.
    Hawk HT-10 pads to fit front 300ZX (4 piston) calipers: $150 a set.
    Hawk Blue for stock S14 240SX: $120/set.

    throw in 3 sets of front rotors and a set for the rear $100/set and I'm looking at roughly $700/year in brake parts to keep the stock brakes on the car.
    Last edited by Matt93SE; 01-04-2011 at 06:29 PM.
    Houston Region
    STU Nissan 240SX
    EProd RX7

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Central FL
    Posts
    74

    Default

    Im currently working slowly on my Honda for this class and will be going non vtec.

    Im just hoping for larger brakes to be approved like my current ITR oem brakes I have on my civic. I would want everyone to have better braking options as mentioned with increased speeds, its somewhat of a safety concern I would think outside of making more cars more attractive (attractive as in more vehicles).
    Last edited by coreyehcx; 01-09-2011 at 09:52 PM.
    CFR STL #59 Civic

    www.circuit-racer.com

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Houston-ish
    Posts
    932

    Default

    Now for a stupid question.. How much faster will your car be than the same weight car in Prod prep? the *current* STU cars are running EP lap times, and Prod requires stock calipers and rotors.
    So will an STL car be faster than an EP or STU car? If no, then it doesn't really NEED larger brakes, does it?

    That said, I'm all in favor of larger brakes from a reliability and longevity perspective- but will the CRB and STAC see it that way?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    1,391

    Default

    the last time I saw corey run he was putting down a lot more power than you would likely see in EP.. more than STL rules would allow too (based on mods). either way - I'm sure there will be a nice big B series in that EH hatch so it's not directly comparable to prod.

    hondas are one of the cars that have brake compounds available. what if you don't have options for your car? you can spend less on pads with an STO car. that's just stoopid

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Black Rock, Ct
    Posts
    9,594

    Default

    there are some good reasons for a brake allowance, but 'safety' isn't one of them. brake earlier. overheating? manage it.

    IF the class were further along, I'd be dead set against it. But, as it's early in it's infancy, fine.

    Just don't do it because it makes the car "look" more like a race car or 'safer"....
    Jake Gulick


    CarriageHouse Motorsports
    for sale: 2003 Audi A4 Quattro, clean, serviced, dark green, auto, sunroof, tan leather with 75K miles.
    IT-7 #57 RX-7 race car
    Porsche 1973 911E street/fun car
    BMW 2003 M3 cab, sun car.
    GMC Sierra Tow Vehicle
    New England Region
    lateapex911(at)gmail(dot)com


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Central FL
    Posts
    74

    Default

    Arent we racing cars like as in race cars?

    I don't see why all the fuss over a bigger braking setup.

    @Chip
    Thanks. I doubt this motor will put down the same type of power but within the given rules I have done everything almost I can. The only thing I didn't do was os pistons incase of a future rebuild. I'm shooting for 150-170whp/120-130trq which I think is pretty doable from the 1.8 non vtec. Higher trq numbers would be nice, the last motor only made around 130.
    CFR STL #59 Civic

    www.circuit-racer.com

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •