Results 1 to 20 of 29

Thread: Some Proposed STL Rules Changes

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Sunnyside, NY
    Posts
    1,197

    Default

    ^^ great work Greg. My guts tells me that you are right with above especially in regard to 1) pushing free IM/TB more (perhaps diameter restriction with limits per cc), especially since STAC is using displacement to establish min weight and 2) alternative control arms. Having the class rules come closer to converging with Prod/GT rules and requiring more money to make competitive a car is not what the STAC/CRB was probably hoping for when STL was birthed.

    (comment: this concept of convergence with prod is nothing new to this forum given what I have read today on other threads. Sorry for stating the obvious.)
    Last edited by mossaidis; 11-10-2010 at 11:54 AM. Reason: grammar... and comments.
    Demetrius Mossaidis aka 'Mickey' #12 ITA NESCCA
    '92 Honda Civic Si
    STFU and "Then write a letter. www.crbscca.com"
    2013 ITA NARRC Champion and I have not raced since.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •