Results 1 to 20 of 44

Thread: Golf IV in B and Beetle in C?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jjjanos View Post
    "seat belts and their attaching hardware and bracketry may be removed."

    2 schools of thought -
    A. That's part of the hardware and bracketry that can be removed
    -or-
    B. The tensioner isn't part of the attaching hardware and you are out of compliance because you lack the tensioner.
    ...or C. The tensioner, which is intergral to the belt assembly, can simply be unbolted, but the bracket that's welded to the chassis has to stay.

    Why is the easiest, most obvious solution not a school of thought...? Not convoluted enough...?



    K

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    907

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Knestis View Post
    ...or C. The tensioner, which is intergral to the belt assembly, can simply be unbolted, but the bracket that's welded to the chassis has to stay.

    Why is the easiest, most obvious solution not a school of thought...? Not convoluted enough...?

    How did you describe that piece of metal? "...the bracket..."
    So, it's a bracket.

    The bracket is integral to an assembly that can be removed, n'est-ce pas?
    We are allowed to remove bracketry, n'est-ce pas?
    Does that bracket serve any other function?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Flagtown, NJ USA
    Posts
    6,335

    Default

    If it's welded to the chassis, is it still a bracket, or is it part of the chassis?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Miller View Post
    If it's welded to the chassis, is it still a bracket, or is it part of the chassis?
    There's the real question...

    And of course, this requires that the specific allowance uses the term "bracket" somewhere.

    K

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    291

    Default

    Just got word on the bug. Roughly 2360 w/o driver and fuel. GET SOME.
    Chris

    Unsquishable bug on the way!!!!!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Wheaton, IL
    Posts
    1,893

    Default

    So on first effort 100 or less over ITB weight.
    Chris Schaafsma
    Golf 2 HProd

    AMT Racing Engines - DIYAutoTune.com

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    291

    Default

    yeah, could have been lighter if i didn't have to patch a sunroof and kept out the extra cage tubing. I'm sure there's some more weight to be cut, but it doesn't really matter since the car is in C and has to be ballasted up to minimum. Either way, I was pretty pumped to hear how light I was able to get it. Shows it's got potential I think. Have to see how it actually does on the track now.
    Chris

    Unsquishable bug on the way!!!!!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    532

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shwah View Post
    So on first effort 100 or less over ITB weight.
    Come again? 2360 + 180 driver + 30 fuel = 2560. That's 200+ lbs heavier than the Golfs in ITB, right?
    Gary Learned
    MiDiv
    Volvo 142E
    http://www.youtube.com/user/denrael

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Flagtown, NJ USA
    Posts
    6,335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rx7chris View Post
    Just got word on the bug. Roughly 2360 w/o driver and fuel. GET SOME LEAD, LOT'S OF LEAD.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •