Originally Posted by
steve b
What was the power gain assumed in "the process" when the car was in ITA? Wasn't it 25%? Did the "B" stickers give me 5% more gain that I don't know about?
the "B" sticker gave you 5%? i guess i should count my blessings.
the first gen crx si had a factor of 1.51 when in ITA (back calculated from the old ITA weight of 1980#'s) and now in "B" i only have a factor of 1.41 for my 12 valve head. or maybe i could you trade you my 41% for your 30%?
maybe we both need to hire the Keane as our engine builder to find these gains?.........
i am still kind of bummed that my 1488 cc honda 12V "B" engine in my crx gets a 41% mulitiplier and the Keane 1955 cc honda 12V "B" engine in the accord gets the default 25% multiplier. i still don't understand those differences.........
but in all seriousness, in November of 2009, i re-submitted my request for a car diet after some emails with a CRB member because there was a misconception by some on the CRB that the 85-87 crx si had been through "the process" when in fact they were simply assessed a 150 # adder when moved to B.
does the fact that my request is not addressed in FT mean that it is still be reviewed or should i consider it to be lost in the shuffle. i do not recall it being in a FT since then.
1985 CRX Si competed in Solo II: AS, CS, DS, GS
1986 CRX Si competed in: SCCA Solo II CSP, SCCA ITA, SCCA ITB, NASA H5
1988 CRX Si competed in ITA & STL
Bookmarks