Jeebus.
If there's room for something called "Errors and Omissions," one would think that "We were dumbasses and used the wrong number by mistake in a committee call in April 2008, and would like to fix it" would qualify.
We started making noise about that mistake inside the ITAC literally 20+ months ago.
But as far as "new evidence" goes, there's no provision to consider it. If there is, someone explain how and why, and based on whose decision.
In public, for the membership.
K
Bookmarks