I am all in favor of making the cage/seat connection stronger. The data 'may' proove that is may not be necessaary but piece of mind about it goes a long way.


Quote Originally Posted by Andy Bettencourt View Post
Which puts an unfair responsibility on a tech inspector to determine something he is not chartered or prepared to do. A 9th mount is a 9th mount is a 9th mount.
Not too familar but...isn't the annual or first log book tech a saftey check? If so, I can show up with a cage that has 80 mounting points but as long as it has the correct main, size etc, it should pass tech? But then get caught out in a protest?