Results 1 to 20 of 363

Thread: FWD vs RWD: Adders, Subtractors, and Weight, Oh my...!

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    hampden,ma.usa
    Posts
    3,083

    Default

    Honest question: there seems to be some agreement here that ITS and ITR FWD cars need more of a break due to the problem of higher horsepower cars putting too much stress on the front tires because of weight distribution and the front tires doing all the work. There is also a feeling from some R cars will need more that S cars. Is this higher need by the R cars at all mitigated by wider wheels and by extension tires allowed in ITR?
    dick patullo
    ner scca IT7 Rx7

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Northern, CA
    Posts
    217

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dickita15 View Post
    Honest question: there seems to be some agreement here that ITS and ITR FWD cars need more of a break due to the problem of higher horsepower cars putting too much stress on the front tires because of weight distribution and the front tires doing all the work. There is also a feeling from some R cars will need more that S cars. Is this higher need by the R cars at all mitigated by wider wheels and by extension tires allowed in ITR?
    Ya know that is a really really good point.....Seriously

    This may even explain why the 50lbs seems to work for both ITA and ITB.

    on that note maybe it should should end up more like.

    ITR - 150
    ITS - 150
    ITA - 50
    ITB - 50
    ITC - 0

    Thoughts?
    Mike Uhlinger



  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Black Rock, Ct
    Posts
    9,594

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ekim952522000 View Post

    on that note maybe it should should end up more like.

    ITR - 150
    ITS - 150
    ITA - 50
    ITB - 50
    ITC - 0

    Thoughts?
    I'm cool with that, I guess, but I might bump ITR up to 175. I'd really have to look at the numbers closely -that's just my gut. But hey, we're all cool with doing things because our gut says to right??
    Jake Gulick


    CarriageHouse Motorsports
    for sale: 2003 Audi A4 Quattro, clean, serviced, dark green, auto, sunroof, tan leather with 75K miles.
    IT-7 #57 RX-7 race car
    Porsche 1973 911E street/fun car
    BMW 2003 M3 cab, sun car.
    GMC Sierra Tow Vehicle
    New England Region
    lateapex911(at)gmail(dot)com


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Northern, CA
    Posts
    217

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lateapex911 View Post
    I'm cool with that, I guess, but I might bump ITR up to 175. I'd really have to look at the numbers closely -that's just my gut. But hey, we're all cool with doing things because our gut says to right??
    I could see that making sense.

    ITR - 175
    ITS - 150
    ITA - 50
    ITB - 50
    ITC - 0

    Could I get some opinions on how how people feel about the FWD strut cars getting 50lbs off but no other cars in ITR getting any adjustment for suspension?
    Mike Uhlinger



  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ekim952522000 View Post
    I could see that making sense.

    ITR - 175
    ITS - 150
    ITA - 50
    ITB - 50
    ITC - 0

    Could I get some opinions on how how people feel about the FWD strut cars getting 50lbs off but no other cars in ITR getting any adjustment for suspension?
    It is a different approach but the thought process is that the cars in ITR are all pretty advanced compared to a lot of IT cars. When you throw a car like the RSX Type S in there, we tried to balance it out by giving it (and any other car like it present or future), that -50lb 'adder'.
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •