Quote Originally Posted by seckerich View Post
Not to beat another really dead horse Andy (and entire ITAC) , but will you guys use the same logic when the 2005 RX8 with the revised lower HP ratings is classed? Same exact mechanical car with realistic HP that was not tweaked by marketing. It was such a sticking point to use the highest number in all the discussions and multipliers. I was told you had to use the highest reported number because the 2004 was being classed. Please note I am just giving you a hard time.
I wasn't on that call as you know, but IIRC 238hp is the lowest and most current published number for the RX-8.