I would say that (start with top 5 in each class) is effectively what was done, just what, 2 years ago?
Maybe it's time to move to the next five and do it as you suggest, in small steps.
It is my understanding that all new cars are not classed at a +/- 5 lbs level of accuracy, they are classed at a 100% by the process level of accuracy. To the extent an equation that has as many subjective factors as the process can be said to be 100% accurate.
I do think focusing on a few cars at a time might address my biggest concern. If we do ALL at once, we are going to make more mistakes because a lot of people are going to be arguing for expected hp gain percentages and subjective adders/subtractors solely out of self interest.
Example? Look how hard it was and how long it took to class TWO cars: the RX8 and the V8 ponies in ITR.
Originally Posted by
shwah
Then just start with the top 5 active cars in every class.
When they are done do the next 5 active cars in every class.
Still don't see why this is as hard as you are making it out to be. The 'me' noise will be there regardless, is there now, so it is a non-factor.
You only mention new classifications here - since they do go through cars that are requested for review, why not act on those with 5# accuracy as well?
NC Region
1980 ITS Triumph TR8
Bookmarks