Results 1 to 20 of 43

Thread: MegaSquirt PNP for Miatas

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Suwanee, GA
    Posts
    12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tnord View Post
    what kind of timeframe are you thinking for the 99-00? like 6mos? 1yr? 3yrs?
    Hard to say with a solid degree of accuracy. A year seems fair, I'd like it to be sooner, but I wouldn't advise you to hold out exactly 12 months expecting it to be ready to ship. We haven't started yet and have two MSPNP projects in front of it, and a few other projects in the works too. I'm working on cranking up the R&D work here though to make things come together faster than they have as of late... I'm stretched too thin to do it all. Matt to the rescue .

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Indian Springs, OH
    Posts
    266

    Default

    For what it's worth.........I would call Chris and have him take care of business. The reason I say this is because, after a number of years chasing various gremlins, losing race weekends, and wasting money, I took my car to him and had the Haltech installed and had him tune it. The cost was to go to two less race weekends in a season. Last weekend was the first time out with it, and I learned that the car is now well better than the driver. In the 8 years I have owned it, the car has not run better.

    Racing is now fun again.
    Dave Burchfield
    GLDiv ITS #74
    Mazda RX-7(the one Kirk parked on the tire wall at Seattle)
    (or so I am told)

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Green Valley, Kali
    Posts
    3

    Default

    Travis,

    We have one. It only took a little bit to get it to work. for IT, out of the box, the tune is pretty far off. I've got about 3 hours on a dyno doing spart tables.

    Install was painless.

    I've never gotten it "RIGHT". I had what I thought was a good tune on the dyno, but on track the car was a total dog. The stock ECU and some afm adjutments was a lot better to the butt dyno than the work on the Chassis. I think my error is in spark but...

    Blew the motor up so we haven't gotten back to finishing making it work.

    STRONGLY recommend going with a wideband hookup, and I wish I'd thought twice about having datalogging for it.

    Jerry's guys have been fairly helpful via email. I think they'd be more helpful if I was smarter and asked more articulate questions (not a dig on them, I just think I'm too stupid to educate).

    I think it would be worth paying someone who knows how to tune it to teach you the basics at the dyno with your car, etc.

    S

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Suwanee, GA
    Posts
    12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by avu3 View Post

    I think it would be worth paying someone who knows how to tune it to teach you the basics at the dyno with your car, etc.
    Those last words say it all. For the hardcore DIY crew I encourage exploring and using the MS to learn to tune too. For the race crew though... you need it right, right now. You need it dialed in to perfection on a LOAD BEARING, STEADY STATE dyno. Not a DynoJet or any other inertia dyno that's going to put unrealistic levels of load on the car causing you to tune wacky WOT advance levels, and not allow you to tune the partial throttle areas of the table at all. I'm not sure what kind of dyno avu3's car was tuned on, but I'm going to guess it was inertia only and ended up with way too much advance and very likely too little fuel, the combination of which will cause both a loss of power and detonation. A pro tuner can fudge his way through tuning WOT advance on a inertia dyno reasonably well though some guesswork is still involved, it's nothing compared to a proper steady state dyno with a good tuner. Not to mention they can tune your WHOLE table.

    From a engine control standpoint, the MSPNP gives you all the capability you'll ever need. It just needs to be tuned for your engine. The base map was tuned for a stock motor, you'll have to retweak based on your setup. But the base map shouldn't be that far out. I'd be glad to help one of you guys set one up right for your car. It's easy to do and we've got the equipment. Mac-- when are you in town next?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,489

    Default

    thanks again jerry, that's more great information regarding how the tuning needs to be done on specific types of dynos. i'll have to talk to my guy and see if he has that capability.
    Travis Nordwald
    1996 ITA Miata
    KC Region

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Floyds Knobs, IN
    Posts
    1,093

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FoundSoul View Post
    Those last words say it all. For the hardcore DIY crew I encourage exploring and using the MS to learn to tune too. For the race crew though... you need it right, right now. You need it dialed in to perfection on a LOAD BEARING, STEADY STATE dyno. Not a DynoJet or any other inertia dyno that's going to put unrealistic levels of load on the car causing you to tune wacky WOT advance levels, and not allow you to tune the partial throttle areas of the table at all. I'm not sure what kind of dyno avu3's car was tuned on, but I'm going to guess it was inertia only and ended up with way too much advance and very likely too little fuel, the combination of which will cause both a loss of power and detonation. A pro tuner can fudge his way through tuning WOT advance on a inertia dyno reasonably well though some guesswork is still involved, it's nothing compared to a proper steady state dyno with a good tuner. Not to mention they can tune your WHOLE table.
    +1 Good advice.
    Chris Ludwig
    GL Lakes Div
    www.ludwigmotorsports.com

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Green Valley, Kali
    Posts
    3

    Default

    I somewhat misspoke in my post, we spent most of our time tuning Fuel, and never really futzed with Spark.

    I think the tune was off because our car is a pretty fully built ITA car. Intake track, Header, Exhaust, motor, all not stock. It started and ran, it just was lean out of the box.

    Our car WAS tuned on a steady state dyno, I accept most of the blame for it not being right on track. I think another contributing factor was that the motor was already going sour, I just didn't realize it.

    Thanks much for the feedback, Jerry.

    Scott

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Wandering the USA
    Posts
    1,341

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by avu3 View Post
    ...The stock ECU and some afm adjutments ...
    I don't understand what adjustments you would make to the AFM.
    Marty Doane
    ITS RX-7 #13 (sold)
    2016 Winnebago Journey (home)

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Floyds Knobs, IN
    Posts
    1,093

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eagle7 View Post
    I don't understand what adjustments you would make to the AFM.
    It's common to tweak the ouput of the flapper door AFMs to fool the ECU into changing the mixture.
    Chris Ludwig
    GL Lakes Div
    www.ludwigmotorsports.com

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Wandering the USA
    Posts
    1,341

    Default

    On an IT or SM car? Doesn't sound legal.

    [Edit] Oh, I was thinking mechanical change. I guess resistors would be legal.
    Last edited by Eagle7; 09-12-2008 at 12:33 PM.
    Marty Doane
    ITS RX-7 #13 (sold)
    2016 Winnebago Journey (home)

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Des Moines, IA
    Posts
    451

    Default

    The thing about the AFM adjustment is that it ventures into the whole "Can you prove it - what are the factory specs" thing that permeates the Spec Miata world.

    Jerry, do you have any thoughts about the gains a well-tuned 1.6 Miata with a pretty much stock setup might see with a Megasquirt setup? I'm sure I'm not the only 1.6 SM driver toying with the move to IT.... (Yeah, I know it's hard to quantify...)

    Jarrod
    -----------------------
    Jarrod Igou
    ITR/STU BMW 325i, #92
    Des Moines Valley Region

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Wandering the USA
    Posts
    1,341

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Burchfield View Post
    ...In the 8 years I have owned it, the car has not run better.

    Racing is now fun again.
    Marty Doane
    ITS RX-7 #13 (sold)
    2016 Winnebago Journey (home)

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •