I believe that a glossary is really all that would be needed. The rules are the rules, no need for more of them. With a glossary the definitions are there, no interpretations, just hard definitions. From there it is up to the competitors and the scrutineers to take care of the rest. There is plenty of blatant cheating at both the regional and national level. If you take issue with how someone runs their program, right paper on it! I see “what I consider” illegal stuff on competitors cars all the time. The truth is I really couldn’t care most of the time. I usually will mention to that competitor that I know about it. From there I would only act if I felt it provided them a leg up. I have gone as far as mentioning things to the chief steward which has ended up with multiple cars in tech. Even if it makes the other competitors nervous is enough for me. I think clear glossary definitions would help remove the “what I consider” part?
Chris "The Cat Killer" Childs
Angry Sheep Motorsports
810 417 7777
angrysheepmotorsports.com
IT,SM,SS,Touring, and Super Touring
Bookmarks