I asked a few days ago what the purpose of a new rule was and I was referred back to the start of the thread. [/b]
bill we've disagreed in the past, but i'm with you on this issue.

addressing the quoted question; the purpose of the new rule if it was opened up is to solve a problem we don't yet have. it's being justified in the name of "forward thinking" to give cars not yet eligible or not even yet mfgd a solution to any ECU problems that may come up without even exploring other possibilites. this would be done at the expense of the thousands of IT cars already built.

i just don't get it.