Hi Gregg,
I'd suggest embedding some explanatory text right with the chart graphic. Then, when the inevitable out-of-context spread around the internet happens, there will be some hope that the viewer gets a sense of what the graphic is trying the show, the significance, etc.
cheers,
bruce


Jim,

Is this what you had in mind:


?

Titled for a bunch of biogeeks, these are the principal loads in the coronal plane. For normal people, that means the combined effect of neck tension, bending and shear in the up-down/left-right plane.

I know, I know, there should be no fixed plane associated with the true principal load, but we don't want to give away too much too soon.

Seriously, aside from titles, does anyone see any fundamental problem with this?

TIA
[/b]