first of all, i appreciate you discussing this in public. that, imho, says a lot of you and your confidence.
i think it was discussed before, but i prefer that the powers that be at nasa or scca make the requirements for H & N restraints be something like x% reduction using sled test methods ABC and not make it to an SFI.
any company that can meet this should be approved. i can respect people's choices for the HANS, Isaac, R-3, etc.
i am one of the ones waiting on the side lines (i think we are relatively numerous since the last events i was at, the majority had horse collars or nothing) to buy something because i am not sure that my ~$1000 investment will be formally approved and the $#%@ rules always look like there will be something announced in the next couple of months.
i think i have been waiting a couple of months for a couple of years.
1985 CRX Si competed in Solo II: AS, CS, DS, GS
1986 CRX Si competed in: SCCA Solo II CSP, SCCA ITA, SCCA ITB, NASA H5
1988 CRX Si competed in ITA & STL
Bookmarks