Seems like the rules should be carried forward from the previous year in a class like this unless a recommendation from the local IT7 Advisory Board asks for a change (presumable based on member input) or a petition comes in from drivers asking for something they feel is not being properly represented by the Ad-Hoc.

It would seem like a rubber-stamp go from the previous year. In no way should the RE's proactively change the rules of a driver-created and organized psudo-spec class.

AB