Joe, I hoped to hear from you on the topic, since even working/fielding these cars you approach their treatment in class and rules in an almost objective disinterested fashion.
I assume you mean good ITA car in the last sentence.
Wow, that was a response that I definitely wouldn't have expected.
So the IT potential power is enough that the weight would be quite a lot in ITA targets? 2900 lbs?
Skip any other reason that could have been given, it is justifiably outside the ITA window if that would be the resultant weight.
Extremely interesting that you would (completely hypothetically of course) consider the possible shift to ITA with an SIR for a car that can not realistically get to the front of ITS because it can't legally make competitive weigth for its HP potential, no matter how low they make the weight it in ITS.
You didn't respond in the thread on helping cars legally make their new process weights. I guess without disagreeing that what you mention is a valid method to address the car's classification, I would think providing more legal ways to reduce weight (lexan) in ITS would be easier to move on (given the explosive response to SIR technology) than a move to ITA with SIR.
And given the sturdiness of the rear bumper would make an excellent brake for me when I go too deep!
Probably makes for one excellent example of when else an SIR might be warranted. If ITS 240SX participants were to ask for classing in ITA with an SIR limiting to KA24E potential and resulting warranted weight - it sure would make their whining look rather petty!
Out of curiousity Joe where would you put an SIR in the intake?
[/b]
Bookmarks