what % are u figuring from the RWHP figure? I'm at 178 w/air box on, 187 no air box.Originally posted by Geo@Jan 27 2006, 05:12 AM
That's crank on an engine brake dyno.
[snapback]72451[/snapback]
Mark
#54
what % are u figuring from the RWHP figure? I'm at 178 w/air box on, 187 no air box.Originally posted by Geo@Jan 27 2006, 05:12 AM
That's crank on an engine brake dyno.
[snapback]72451[/snapback]
Mark
#54
Mark Nasrallah
944 S
#54 ITS
Both are very stout numbers. The non air box number especially. Generally, 18% is the accepted figure for driveline loss.Originally posted by wpspeedracer@Jan 27 2006, 06:54 AM
what % are u figuring from the RWHP figure? I'm at 178 w/air box on, 187 no air box.
Mark
#54
[snapback]72456[/snapback]
No calculator here, but thats about 37 HP, so both numbers are ahead of the curve, unless I am missing something.
Jake Gulick
CarriageHouse Motorsports
for sale: 2003 Audi A4 Quattro, clean, serviced, dark green, auto, sunroof, tan leather with 75K miles.
IT-7 #57 RX-7 race car
Porsche 1973 911E street/fun car
BMW 2003 M3 cab, sun car.
GMC Sierra Tow Vehicle
New England Region
lateapex911(at)gmail(dot)com
Are you really trying to tell me you're getting 9 hp by eliminating the airbox? I'm having a very hard time believing that is real.what % are u figuring from the RWHP figure? I'm at 178 w/air box on, 187 no air box.
Mark
#54
[/b]
George Roffe
Houston, TX
84 944 ITS car under construction
92 ITS Sentra SE-R occasionally borrowed
http://www.nissport.com
Bookmarks