John (I assume JWS is John Stewart)

<font face=\"Verdana, Arial\" size=\"2\">Let's canvass all the HP guys too</font>


Since you asked!

Being a tad melodramatic aren't you? "Spoil" racing for the E36 folks? PLEASE!

Your #6 point just shows how much of a jackass crybaby you are. The 'run into you' comment just reinforces it.

You guys (E36's) got off easy w/ just the restrictor, IMHO. As I've stated before, those cars really don't belong in IT, as they sure don't fit the PP&I of the category.

As far as those subframes, I'm in on that one too. And I guess I missed it when the E36 ITS cars were allowed to run 8" wide wheels.

Oh, and in case you didn't see this in the ITCS.

<font face=\"Verdana, Arial\" size=\"2\">Entrants shall not be guaranteed the compeitiveness of any car...</font>


Darin's right (ok, nobody have a heart attack), car specs should be set based on how they stack up w/ the performance envelope of the class. Track results shouldn't mean squat!! They may however, provide the impetus to re-evaluate a car's specs, to see if they are consistent w/ the class performance envelope.

------------------
MARRS #25 ITB Rabbit GTI (sold) | MARRS #25 HProd Rabbit
SCCA 279608