Originally posted by Dick Patullo:
while i could not agree more with you position about wiring harnesses the intent statement really does not carry much weight with me. it is not like the rules are based on that statement as much as the statement is sometimes reviewed based on where the rules have gone. a case in point is that IT cars used to be dual purpose track and street. after the rules evolved enough so that few cars fit that model the intent was finally changed. I am sorry but broad reviews sound good but they are almost impossible to implement in our culture.
that said this type of debate has value. it brings out positions that have not been considered and slowly makes changes happen.
while i get frustated with that process being slow on the changes that I think are good I am thankfull for it on the ones that I think are rules creep.
Bookmarks