Originally posted by BVinson:
Chuck,
I agree with you, they did miss the weight by alot.
Guys...

ONE MORE TIME... the weight was PURPOSFULLY SET where it is... It has not been "missed", or is otherwise NOT INCORRECT for the cars potential...

There is nothing in the ITCS that says the weight of your car will be set based on what it would really weight were it to be gutted, caged, or otherwise prepped for IT. The weights are set to create a car that is compeitive with other cars in the class.

This car, based on it's specifications, is set at a nearly IDEAL weight for ITS. In other words, the weight to "potential" power ratio is right in line with any number of other ITS front runners (even a litte better based on some of your numbers...)

I can't believe you guys are complaining, when you have cars that can actually be made to meet the minimum weight... You can't POSSIBLY know how good you have it!

By the way... we have a couple of these cars out here and they are REALLY freakin fast... A fully developed one should really turn some heads...

Go have some fun! I wish I had this kind of problem... SHEESH!

------------------
Darin E. Jordan
SCCA #273080, OR/NW Regions
Renton, WA
ITS '97 240SX


[This message has been edited by Banzai240 (edited September 13, 2004).]