Originally posted by chuck baader:
Scott, obviously you got disillusioned about the NASA program but it works for a lot of people if for nothing else as an alternative place to set up a car without pressure. And why won't it work with various modles? Power to weight is power to weight...a somewhat level playing field. What you are missing is the fact that an SCCA ITS car with a weak motor can run GTS1 and be competitive without spending 6k on a motor.
Jake, before you criticize their dyno policy, read their rules governing car classifications. IMHO they have removed much if the agnst the GCR provides.
The addition of a "power switch" is certainly easy...cheaters will cheat irregardless of any rule. Just like SCCA, there will be those who run by the rules and those who feel it necessary to cheat.
I don't intend to run NASA more than one race a year as their schedule conflicts with SEDIV's most of the year. However, if I have the choice of driving 3 hours to RA or 6 hours to Kershaw, I pick RA every time. Its cheap seat time and an excellent chassis sorting opportunity.
Bookmarks