Originally posted by erlrich:
Aw, c'mon Darin, this isn't Bill, you don't have to argue just for the sake of argument
VERY FUNNY!




Common sense says...
Say no more... That is where you lose this arguement!


I think we'll just have to file this under "agree to disagree". Btw, has anyone ever heard of a protest being filed on the basis of "improper matching"?
I've never heard of a protest, but I can say with near certainty that the rule is as George and I have described... I personally wrote a letter to the CRB a couple of months ago asking this to be looked at for precisely this loophole/ambiguity in the rules, and the decision was returned that the rules were adequate as written, even given the issue we've been discussing. There is simply no way to make a ruling on this after the fact, because there isn't a clear limitation or definition on what a "port match" is...

I can tell you right now... those guys that are beating you and I are reading the rule the same way that I do...


------------------
Darin E. Jordan
SCCA #273080, OR/NW Regions
Renton, WA
ITS '97 240SX


[This message has been edited by Banzai240 (edited November 11, 2004).]