Results 1 to 20 of 165

Thread: March 2014 Fastrack

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by spawpoet View Post
    240 Zs came with three different heads, two different carbs, at least 3 different intake manifolds, and two different transmissions across the production run from 1970-1973. How many spec lines should they have had when they initially classed the old Datsuns?
    Additional examples:

    *ITS Jensen Healey - has more factory cams than the engine has valves. Lots of parts.
    *ITB Mustang - lots of heads, cams, induction changes, etc.
    *ITS Mustang - many parts, not ITB Mustang status though
    *ITR Mustang V6 - similar to the ITS Mustang
    *ITS TR8 - Convertible, coupe, FI, carb all on one line

    I do understand the ITAC not wanting to repeat process mistakes made in the past. But it doesn't appear that we're in danger of creating a problem with the RX8. Indeed, if we were to assume that we have created problems in the past, for example, the ITB Mustang classing is what we're trying to avoid, what was the impact on SCCA ITB racing of that classification?
    Last edited by Ron Earp; 02-27-2014 at 10:04 AM.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •