-
no dog in the hunt, but no, he didn't use whp. he used 120 hp/l which you just stated was the estimated chp/l for STU. you assume a 15% driveline loss and you could just as easily have said 102 whp/l (120*0.85).
weight to wheel hp numbers following Greg's math (which is correct):
120hp/liter x 0.85 x 1 liter/1000cc x cc/1.1# = .093 hp/#, or 10.75 #/hp
And FWIW, 102whp/l is much more in line with STL, I don'thave a clue what one might actually see in STU
Last edited by Chip42; 01-29-2013 at 11:14 AM.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks