You are right, we are not. However we are doing something that involves a fair amount of difficulty -- getting people to volunteer to spend a minimum of 4 and more like 10-15 hours a month on a committee doing fairly thankless work. Adding in "you will get lambasted for anything and everything you say on committee on the internet" to that and you radically reduce the number of good folks who will want to do this.

I am 100% in agreement with you that all data we consider in making decisions on gain, or stock hp, should be open to membership. What I am saying is that some of the discussions, argument, and personal opinions on how to interpret that data should be left to the individual committee member as to whether they want to disclose it or not.