![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
Knestis
Fair enough. My point - not well made - was that "they are race cars" is a lousy reason, in and of itself. If the view is that ST(whatever) warrants bigger brakes, the easy answer is to spec a maximum diameter and thickness, front and rear, for each class, and let folks go nuts. That's consistent with the first assumption re: engine size.
The idea that alternatives will be "considered" on a case-by-case basis, or some such, is pretty dangerous.
K
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
Andy Bettencourt
I think the point is simple: Either allow them for everyone or none. Don't dork it up with line-item allowances.
Agreed on both counts. The STU rules are just that.. max diameter, thickness, and piston count. done. I don't see why STL should be any different, assuming there is a need for them over OEM rotors/calipers.
But those are the 2010 STU rules.. Or have they changed that too?
Houston Region
STU Nissan 240SX
EProd RX7
Bookmarks