Seems to me that ITAC listens to requests for change, and then sends a decision on to CRB.
CRB's process is opaque and impenetrable. Their decisions are rendered and that's that. No further input from members wanted! And don't even try an e-mail.

Matt's reference to the HANS decision is right on target.

So what's going on? Who decided that SCCA was to be a top down dictatorship when it comes to members asking for explanations?

In a time of quick and easy communication, this situation is unjustified.

Seems similar to France in the late 1790's - and they had a real revolution.
Let's start bringing the tumbrils to the False Grid.

Bill Miskoe