Quote Originally Posted by Bill Miller View Post

Andy,



You're the one that's putting inflection on it, it was a simple, straight-forward question. Your initial response was the one that was looking for a fight.
Bill, Read post #23. Enough said.


So much for an objective process. And whatever happened to just doing what was right? And since Kirk brought it up, where did the requestor ask for the car to be classed?
You are the one looking for the fight Bill. This IS what we think is right. When I say that just because they LOOK alike on paper - and that they may not be - tells you that we look at more than just the numbers. In this case, the numbers showed either a really light ITB car or a solid ITC choice. Upon tight examination, it was determined that the ITB weight was not reasonable and it was an ITC car. Not really sure why you would have a problem with that logic.

The requestor asked for it to be classed in ITB. What if the orginal requestor of the Golf III to be classed in ITC? Makes no matter to the ITAC really, its a request for a car to be classed. The car goes through the process and lands where it makes the most sense - hopefully smack in the wheelhouse of the class structure we have defined for us. Just because a specific class is asked for - really means little. Would you rather we declined the classification in whole because they 'predicted' the wrong class? I really have no idea what your beef is.

Tell us all this Bill - what isn't "right" about this classification - or are you using it to complain about some VW classification?