Here is Matt's text:

Draft text for ITCS

Jack points may be added to the car provided they fall within the following requirements:

- Two locations only per car may be added, one on each side or one on each end of the car.
- Added jack points may not be used to create any additional roll cage attachment point, ballast location or chassis stiffness, intentional or otherwise.
- Each jack point may be fabricated out of no more than 64 square inches of material welded to the chassis, with no edge dimension longer than 10”. Material to be used may not be thicker than 3/16”.
- Reinforcing of existing chassis seams/intersections may be used, provided that the materials used are in accordance with the above statement and length of reinforcement is no grater than 10”.
- The use of additional roll cage member(s) located within the profile of the door opening that makes contact with the body work, but is not affixed to the body work may be added for the use of jacking the car.[/b]
The second statement in that rule violates Greg Amy's second commandment of rules, thou shall not say what you can't do for fear that people will assume everything else is allowed.

But seriously I could take that wording an effectively create a nice subframe tie, er jacking point. Now the rule says no chassis stiffening is allowed but we have had endless debates before where two groups will disagree abouth the effects of legal modifications.

Again, all I see is another rule to be tortured and an unconvincing argument that people can't safely jack up their car.

Are we really playing the safety card for a rule change?