Well, I was listening, and thinking (that's the dangerous part) and came up with yet another variation on the format for a race weekend that has NO practice and NO qualifying, just racing.

Saturday AM is short sprint races, grid set by drivers NERRC (or NARRC, or MARRS) points in that class.
Maybe 10 or 12 lap races at LRP or NHIS, 6 or 8 at Summit. If playing with the pace car takes too much time, then can it, and have the pole sitter set the pace.

So, you don't have time to be late. You don't have time to warm up. Unload, get the engine warm, and go out and race. No screwing around, no excuses.

Saturday PM is regional length races, grid is set by fastest lap in the previous race.

Sunday AM is another (even shorter?) sprint race, grid set by the fastest time
in either Saturday sessions.

Sunday PM is a longer than regional race (but probably not National length) with the grid set by fastest time from the three previous sessions. (Or maybe, the fastest time from Sunday AM only.)

The people who run the events need to tighen up their act (in terms of way too much downtime between sessions) to make this work, and you may get only two minutes warning on the grid.

Is such short notice OK?

If you break on course (or crash ), you may get taken out thru some back gate and brought back into the paddock, or maybe, you might be left out there for a session or two (if the car is in a safe place.) For example, if there is one (or two) more sessions before lunch or the afternoon snack run, and it is going to stop the event for 5 or 8 minutes to drag you back in, you may just as well help the flaggers for a session, they need the help in any case and you may find a new crew person or teach them a thing or two.

Pros: 4 races in one weekend
Cons: time is tight and screwing about between sessions will kill the day.

So, what do people think?

More races, no qualifying. Is it worth the work to make it happen?