Originally posted by Joe Harlan:
My point is that the current target was a screw-up and it needs fixed. The touring rule would be a proper target.
HOW do you KNOW it was a "screw-up"??? The language appears to me to be very SPECIFICALLY different than the Touring rules... HOW do you guys know this isn't what the board/committee at the time intended?? I think, rather, that because you guys don't LIKE the current rule, you think it's wrong, but that doesn't make it a "screw-up"... How do we know that it wasn't intended to be exactly like it is? The phrase "or replace" leaves little abiguity as to what it means... Hard for me to buy that those that put it there didn't know exactly what it would allow...

But again, I'm all for taking this rule back to the Touring rule... It's not going to make ANY difference as far as the competition goes on the track (those that have will still have and those that don't will bitch about it...), but if it makes everyone feel better, I suppose it's a simple enough thing to change...



------------------
Darin E. Jordan
SCCA #273080, OR/NW Regions
Renton, WA
ITS '97 240SX