Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: How do we attract new racers?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    American Endurance Racing AER - 180TW tires

    Champ Car Endurance Racing - 180TW tires

    24 Hours of Lemons - 190TW tires

    NASA PT, SE30, 944 and SM Classes - Significant penalty for 40TW tires/Toyo spec tires/Toyo spec Tires/Mandated Hoosier tires but the price is significantly subsidized and their contingency is good

    Why are they so successful despite their lack of organization and structure. What did the SCCA (and MCSCC) miss? What happened while we got so comfy?
    <crickets, crickets, crickets, crickets, crickets, crickets...>


    (Probably just coincidence)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Chicagoland, IL
    Posts
    213

    Default

    Agree... that is part of the story isn't it. But it that it? You feel that it's a one dimensional issue? It's not about the run-what-you-brung, easy to understand rules? The bracket-racing? I agree with you on the Spec and PT tire rules completely, but do you think 944, Spec E30, and SM are only successful due to tire rules?
    Racer of old BMW's.
    MCSCC ITS Class E30 325is
    Racing where IT still exists: http://www.mcscc.org/

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kgobey View Post
    But it that it? You feel that it's a one dimensional issue?
    Absolutely not. But I think the cost aspect - or even the impression of a cost aspect - certainly can be a significant factor.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Chicagoland, IL
    Posts
    213

    Default

    Yeah that's it exactly. The notion that "I can be guaranteed a level playing field", combined with the notion that the rules are super easy for a lay-person to understand and build to and a simple formula for legitimacy in licensing are what drives them to these other series.

    We can never compete on outright track time, but we can compete on ease of use. But how... ?
    Racer of old BMW's.
    MCSCC ITS Class E30 325is
    Racing where IT still exists: http://www.mcscc.org/

  5. #5

    Default

    Brand identity definitely seems to be part of the problem. The very popular classes can be (and are) described in a succinct, attractive way.

    If someone asked me to describe Improved Touring racing, I'm not confident that I can give them a short, interesting elevator speech.
    Roger Maeda - #7 ITS Honda Prelude Si
    South Jersey Region

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by boxedfox View Post
    If someone asked me to describe Improved Touring racing, I'm not confident that I can give them a short, interesting elevator speech.
    Very good point.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,106

    Default

    I've only done LeMons and it was great!

    Some of the most interesting cars ever seen on track. Think spreedycop or 5 cylinder radial aircraft engine, etc.

    No license but for $$ so some team members that had never raced joined. One now has a SCCA license.

    Team environment so that was fun. And some just tried it and said enough and bailed and do track days.

    I don't think the typical SCCA racer really exists any more. Most younger folks think something looks interesting and try it and then decide something else looks interesting and moves on.

    Sticking with the same car or class for years or decades is not the way of the world any more.

    Not good or bad, just different.
    1985 CRX Si competed in Solo II: AS, CS, DS, GS
    1986 CRX Si competed in: SCCA Solo II CSP, SCCA ITA, SCCA ITB, NASA H5
    1988 CRX Si competed in ITA & STL

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •