Results 1 to 20 of 128

Thread: Your Thoughts on Mandating 200+TW "Street Tires" in Improved Touring?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Wandering the USA
    Posts
    1,341

    Default

    How would this affect an IT car running in STL under the IT prep rules???
    Marty Doane
    ITS RX-7 #13 (sold)
    2016 Winnebago Journey (home)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    High Point, NC
    Posts
    368

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eagle7 View Post
    How would this affect an IT car running in STL under the IT prep rules???
    You'd get your ass kicked even worse.

    I'm a little tired of some of the naysaying on the brown board that is coming from people who are not even going to be running IT with SCCA ever. If you have no interest in ever running IT go find some other pot to stir up, I'm sure some autocrossers are bitching about something somewhere, go muddy their water.

    I did some shopping, and for me, 245/45R17 the 200TW offerings save me a minimum of $400 per set, which is basically an extra entry fee.

    That is significant enough to get my attention for sure.

    open up wheel diameter rules to allow everyone to find a tire and wheel combo that works for them
    Limit maximum wheel width per class.
    Limit maximum tire cross section per class.
    reserve the right to create a tire exclusion list if a tire does not meet the spirit of the rule.
    Set a Date for another round of member input on the subject after one full season of the rules implementation. Or is that just asking for a barrel of monkeys?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Conover View Post
    You'd get your ass kicked even worse.

    I'm a little tired of some of the naysaying on the brown board that is coming from people who are not even going to be running IT with SCCA ever. If you have no interest in ever running IT go find some other pot to stir up, I'm sure some autocrossers are bitching about something somewhere, go muddy their water.

    I did some shopping, and for me, 245/45R17 the 200TW offerings save me a minimum of $400 per set, which is basically an extra entry fee.

    That is significant enough to get my attention for sure.

    open up wheel diameter rules to allow everyone to find a tire and wheel combo that works for them
    Limit maximum wheel width per class.
    Limit maximum tire cross section per class.
    reserve the right to create a tire exclusion list if a tire does not meet the spirit of the rule.
    Set a Date for another round of member input on the subject after one full season of the rules implementation. Or is that just asking for a barrel of monkeys?
    Most of this...

    ...but make it even simpler by just defining a max section width. Easy to check compliance, limits what matters. Done.

    K

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    High Point, NC
    Posts
    368

    Default

    Hi Cameron,Thank you for submitting a request/input to the Club Racing Board. The details of your request can be found below.
    Letter ID Number: #24752
    Title: Tires with a minimum treadwear rating of 200 for all IT cars.
    Class: IT General
    Request: 2018 is my first season in Improved Touring with my own car. Yes, I just built a new build for IT. My car is a 2008 VW Rabbit 5cyl 2.5L in ITS. My first exposure to SCCA was through my involvement with an ITB car, 1996 VW Golf 2.0L, from about 2003 to 2010. I have always had a fond appreciation of Improved Touring since then and always wanted to race in IT. I chose ITS because in my division ITS is pretty strong, fairly large fields.

    I have no experience driving on 200TW tires, so I find myself anxious about this proposal, however, I do see the potential benefit. I have been told that these new extreme performance 200TW tires are very good, that they are more consistent over more heat cycles than what I currently run, Hoosier R7 225/45R17. And I see that a set of these tires is at minimum about $400 less expensive than the Hoosiers that I am currently buying. And that these tires are slightly slower, maybe 2 seconds over a 3 mile course, due to a lower grip level.

    If these assertions are true, and keeping in mind the savings, I would be able to potentially spend more money on entry fees and less on tires, which would be a very welcome change. Track time is expensive and precious, I am certain that my savings would go toward more event weekends or more races in the same weekend.

    I also think that IT could benefit from carving out a place for itself, a distinction from the myriad of classifications, as an affordable place to race against multiple makes where one can build and enter the type of car they prefer. As opposed to the plethora of affordable entry level spec classes. Some of us do not wish to race a spec car. I got my license in an SM and my first two seasons were in SM, I appreciate the class, but I really prefer to have some fun building a car that I like.

    Finally, I think if we are to choose this path, wheel rules should be opened up so that everyone can find a tire that will suit them. I would suggest to eliminate wheel diameter and width restrictions and only specify a maximum tire section width per class. 205 for C and B, 225 for A, and 245 for S. Something like this would be appropriate and regulates what actually matters, which is the contact patch. These tires are not all made in the same sizes available in the DOT-R's, so opening up wheel diameters would allow people to find a size that works for them.

    Thank you for requesting member input regarding Improved Touring, whatever happens, I hope it is for the best for the category as a whole.
    Cameron Conover

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,106

    Default

    I'm opposed.

    Those running small tires are toast, e.g., 13". I can understand the appeal for those running +16" but to state open up the wheels/tires rules is meaningless if there are no real tires in your size.

    I don't think this will bring in new drivers. The LeChump model is not easily transferred.
    1985 CRX Si competed in Solo II: AS, CS, DS, GS
    1986 CRX Si competed in: SCCA Solo II CSP, SCCA ITA, SCCA ITB, NASA H5
    1988 CRX Si competed in ITA & STL

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    High Point, NC
    Posts
    29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tom91ita View Post
    I'm opposed.

    Those running small tires are toast, e.g., 13". I can understand the appeal for those running +16" but to state open up the wheels/tires rules is meaningless if there are no real tires in your size.

    I don't think this will bring in new drivers. The LeChump model is not easily transferred.
    If I can attend more races with a reduced tire budget then I affectively become a new driver at all those events I wasn't previously going to. So far my car has been to VIR, my home track, and Barber on a whim. If my costs are less and I can travel more all those other tracks get to welcome me as a new driver.

  7. #7

    Default

    I'm in favor of mandating spec tyre or a longer-lasting tyre. We have an ITA CRX that is sitting at a friend's garage because none of us want to buy Hoosiers for it. If we could run it somewhat competitively with tyres that last a little longer or have a lower retail price, it would be out there running in IT with a driver who wouldn't be racing otherwise.
    Roger Maeda - #7 ITS Honda Prelude Si
    South Jersey Region

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    hampden,ma.usa
    Posts
    3,083

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eagle7 View Post
    How would this affect an IT car running in STL under the IT prep rules???
    actually the tire rule for IT cars running in ST or Prod can be anything we want it to be.
    dick patullo
    ner scca IT7 Rx7

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dickita15 View Post
    actually the tire rule for IT cars running in ST or Prod can be anything we want it to be.
    Absolutely correct. Presently, SM can run STL and the GCR says "Must completely conform to SMCS specifications, except spec tire not required."

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •