Results 1 to 20 of 87

Thread: Getting Rid of Regional/Majors Distinction?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JeffYoung View Post
    Good post.
    It's a nice post...but it's filled with wrong-wronginess. Tom, you need to come visit the track again.

    - the "National Races" were something that the Regional drive aspired to...

    Maybe you did, brother, but I didn't and a lot of others didn't. I raced IT because I liked IT. You've fallen prey to that old "national drivers are better" mindset (or maybe you're part of the old guard that created/perpetuated it?) None of us decided to race Improved Touring - or any regional-only class - with the "goal" of going to the Runoffs. Regional classes have never been "starter" classes, except for those that decided that was their path.

    - the ability to run well regionally and show you had the skill to compete...

    Um, no. The only "ability" you needed to get a National license was to finish three Regional races and $50. It had nothing to do with skills, ability, or ultimate goals. Hell, once you had a National, that and ~$100 got you an SCCA Pro license, and that and another $200 got me an IMSA Pro license; did that automatically increase my skills level?

    - Back in the 70's -- 80's and perhaps the mid 90's running the Nationals implied that you were well skilled and willing to put out your best effort...

    Um, no. Again, "projection". Old Guard s**t.

    - it was just a matter of showing up to an event and you got to go to the Runoff's...the only real achievement became a title win.

    I'll agree with part of that: with the exception of the top three classes (SM, FV, and SRF) today all you need is a pulse and a checkbook to qualify for the Runoffs. But even back then when it was much more difficult, you think most sat on their laurels and called that invitation a "win"? Hell no. Qualifying was the first step, and we all went there to compete for the title win. Just because it's easier to get in doesn't mean the achievement of competing and winning means less.

    - even the Runoff's doesn't generate that much interest (sort of like the regional races, the only spectators are the entrants and their family & friends).

    Dude, you seriously need to get to a recent Runoffs. I don't know about the 90s, but the last several years at Road America, and this year At Laguna Seca, had a s**t-ton of spectators. Place was packed.

    - no desire to aspire to a National license.

    Need to keep up, grampa. there's no longer Regional and National licenses, only a "competition license".

    - you get much more track time then 20 minutes at a regional...

    Again, come visit an NER event. You're really missing out if you think that's all they are. Seriously, come visit.

    So...how would removing the Regional/National (classes) distinction affect this in any way?

    GA
    Last edited by Greg Amy; 12-12-2014 at 07:54 PM.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •