Results 1 to 20 of 87

Thread: Getting Rid of Regional/Majors Distinction?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Let's put it this way: without the Regional/Majors distinction, there would be a ton of classes/categories that simply would not exist. Improved Touring for one, and others like SSM, SMT, ITE, ITEZ, Super Production, ASR, Club Ford, Club S2000, etc.

    Be careful what you wish for.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    raleigh, nc, usa
    Posts
    5,252

    Default

    Not necessarily. They might still exist. They just wouldn't go to the Runoffs.

    More and more, maybe it is getting older, I like simplicity. The idea of taking the top 10 or 14 or whatever classes in a particular year participation wise and having them go to the runoffs makes sense to me. The cream, and popular classes, rise to the top, like the English soccer leagues, with relegation.

    We made a mistake five years ago not pushing for that I think, all of us, and instead got more classes (all of which have good ideas).
    NC Region
    1980 ITS Triumph TR8

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •