Results 1 to 20 of 32

Thread: stl gear ratios rule interpretation Q

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Houston-ish
    Posts
    932

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Greg Amy View Post
    Neither the CRB nor the STAC (nor I) has made a proclamation that "no" consideration will be made until data on a full-tilt build is presented to them.

    However, there's absolutely zero point in making chances until someone builds one*.

    We can always go back to "US market engines only" if it'll make people feel better...that way there's no ambiguity.

    GA

    * If you truly believe that 2mm of TIR will make that much of a difference, enough so that you'll not even consider building it, then IMO it's not going to be a competitive package anyway...
    I see/saw it all the time when people are/were asking for help for a particular car. "we believe that engine will make 30%. you only make 25% so you must be doing something wrong. keep trying and come back when you spend more money and still can't make 30%."

    This engine with a stock T28 turbo will NEVER be competitive with 20-year newer technology and way better turbos, but it's a farsight better than the current KA that's sucking air through a crappy intake manifold and tiny throttle body that can't be changed. My plan for an SR20 build was intended as a cheap way to get CLOSER to the competition, and I don't intend to build it to the limits. However, if its going to just be choked down from day 1 then why even bother spending thousands only to still get beat by the same people that already beat me?

    I'll quit beating the dead horse and let these guys get back to the topic- it's not going to get me anywhere anyway..
    Houston Region
    STU Nissan 240SX
    EProd RX7

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    107

    Default

    letter reviewed and response out on 20th...excellent

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,106

    Default

    Based on the prelims, sounds like you can mix and match....

    Is that how you read it?
    1985 CRX Si competed in Solo II: AS, CS, DS, GS
    1986 CRX Si competed in: SCCA Solo II CSP, SCCA ITA, SCCA ITB, NASA H5
    1988 CRX Si competed in ITA & STL

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Yup.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •