Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: New STL Fan

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by snowmann View Post
    My point is, if they're equal in ITS why would it not be so in STL?
    Because your BMW has a 2.5L engine. The class limit is 2.0L

    And I'm not being flippant. That is exactly, completely, 100% why you are not allowed to compete in STL. We don't really care about performance potential; we recognize it's not likely to be competitive against "true" STL cars. That's beside the point.

    Would there be a large objection, based solely on the fact that it's not less than 2.0 liters, to the BMW classed as an alternate allowance similar to that of the ITS RX7 with ITS weight and prep in STL?
    Yes, there would be.

    Get <2.01L engine and you're in.

    GA

    * Note that you are not the only one that recognizes the inconsistency about how a 13B engine is actually rated at 2.6L per the GCR. In a 2L piston-engine class. Don't bother, you're preaching to the choir on that one.
    Last edited by Greg Amy; 06-19-2014 at 12:36 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Dubuque, Ia.
    Posts
    36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Greg Amy View Post
    * Note that you are not the only one that recognizes the inconsistency about how a 13B engine is actually rated at 2.6L per the GCR. In a 2L piston-engine class. Don't bother, you're preaching to the choir on that one.
    This.

    That was my rambling point.
    #38 ITS BMW
    Midwestern Council of Sports Car Clubs
    Tim Schreyer

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Fredericksburg, VA
    Posts
    1,191

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Greg Amy View Post
    Because your BMW has a 2.5L engine. The class limit is 2.0L

    And I'm not being flippant. That is exactly, completely, 100% why you are not allowed to compete in STL. We don't really care about performance potential; we recognize it's not likely to be competitive against "true" STL cars. That's beside the point.
    ...coughSTUCamaro....coughSTUMustang.....

    As the man (generic) said, rules are rules...until they're not.
    Earl R.
    240SX
    ITA/ST5

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    CT/NY/NJ
    Posts
    1,157

    Default

    Having driven one of the largest engines in ITA, I feel your pain. We were in the same boat. ----- We even ran ITS with the car once, but that's another story.


    13B is called a 13B for a reason... 1.3L.
    Chris Rallo "the kid"
    -- "wrenching and racing" -- "will race for food!" -- "Onward and Upward"

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CRallo View Post
    13B is called a 13B for a reason... 1.3L.
    Can I "call" my engine 0.9L? 'Cause if that's all it takes...

    (Google it.)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    Correct me here Greg but common thought process:

    Even though the 13B may have 1300ish cc's of actual volume it acts like a 2-stroke. So they class it effectively as 2.6L because it has twice as many power strokes per revolution as a conventional piston engine...1 power stroke per rotor every revolution whereas the CPE has 1 PS every other revolution.
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,717

    Default

    By that reason, the 325's M20 normally called 2492cc motor is actually a 1247cc's because that's what it uses in one revolution of the crank, so it's STL legal then
    STU BMW Z3 2.5liter

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andy Bettencourt View Post
    Even though the 13B may have 1300ish cc's of actual volume it acts like a 2-stroke. So they class it effectively as 2.6L because it has twice as many power strokes per revolution as a conventional piston engine...1 power stroke per rotor every revolution whereas the CPE has 1 PS every other revolution.
    Quote Originally Posted by Z3_GoCar View Post
    By that reason, the 325's M20 normally called 2492cc motor is actually a 1247cc's because that's what it uses in one revolution of the crank, so it's STL legal then
    Right!

    And if one wants to get pissy about it...go read the GCR Technical Glossary definition (which I don't agree with, and tried to get corrected...)

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •