Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 66

Thread: ECU mods

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    665

    Default ECU mods

    If I start with a car that has an mass air flow sensor (MAF) signalling the stock ECU, but the modded ECU only accepts a manifold absolute pressure (MAP) input (all of the less expensive ones work this way), 1) am I allowed to add a MAP sensor to the intake manifold (assuming I can get the signal to the modded ECU through the stock ECU electrical connector), and 2) can I remove or disable the unused stock MAF sensor?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Houston, TX USA
    Posts
    2,555

    Default

    Originally posted by Eric Parham:
    If I start with a car that has an mass air flow sensor (MAF) signalling the stock ECU, but the modded ECU only accepts a manifold absolute pressure (MAP) input (all of the less expensive ones work this way), 1) am I allowed to add a MAP sensor to the intake manifold (assuming I can get the signal to the modded ECU through the stock ECU electrical connector), and 2) can I remove or disable the unused stock MAF sensor?
    No in both cases.


    ------------------
    George Roffe
    Houston, TX
    84 944 ITS car under construction
    92 ITS Sentra SE-R occasionally borrowed
    http://www.nissport.com

  3. #3
    Guest

    Default

    Pandora's ECU box, what a nightmare.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Kensington, CT, USA
    Posts
    1,013

    Default

    The rule is simple - you can mod it as long as those mods are done within the stock box. Any mods or aditional sensors outside of the box are clear no-no's.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Renton, WA USA
    Posts
    1,625

    Default

    Originally posted by Jake:
    The rule is simple - you can mod it as long as those mods are done within the stock box. Any mods or aditional sensors outside of the box are clear no-no's.
    I believe this includes adding additional wires to the box... In other words, I'm pretty sure it must utilize the stock, unaltered wiring harness/connector.



    ------------------
    Darin E. Jordan
    SCCA #273080, OR/NW Regions
    Renton, WA
    ITS '97 240SX

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    23

    Default

    I have the MAP sensor inside the ecu box and a vacuum hose going to the ecu box.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    Clever... What rule are you using to allow the additional vac line? I've never thought about this approach.

    K

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Portland, Oregon, USA
    Posts
    78

    Default

    Plus, disabling the MAF might fit under the "altering the value" of the sensor. In this case you are just altering it to zero.

    Britt

    ------------------
    Soon to be SSC Mazda MP3

    Vintage Cosworth Vega

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    23

    Default

    Originally posted by Knestis:
    Clever... What rule are you using to allow the additional vac line? I've never thought about this approach.
    Thanks, but unfortunately I don't even know for sure if this is going to fly when the car is tech inspected. I wonder if anyone has been able to replace their ECU with aftermarket equipment while completely satisfying the rules.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    23

    Default

    Oh, and for anyone who's interested I used a megasquirt EFI controller. Why? It was cheap and a fun project that kept me busy for months on end. I love projects and I learned a TON about EFI systems. At this point I've tuned it and only assume it's making extra HP, but being able to monitor exactly what's going on with my car is what makes it worth it. http://www.bgsoflex.com/megasquirt.html

    BTW Kirk, I've been talking to you on honda-tech/RR as Eric.


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Houston, TX USA
    Posts
    2,555

    Default

    Originally posted by Eric R287:
    Thanks, but unfortunately I don't even know for sure if this is going to fly when the car is tech inspected. I wonder if anyone has been able to replace their ECU with aftermarket equipment while completely satisfying the rules.
    Tech inspectors are not going to look at your car for anything other than safety issues unless someone protests you.

    Your car will be illegal.

    17.1.4.D.1.a.6:

    "Fuel injected cars may alter or replace the engine management computer, or ECU, provided that all modifications are done within the original OEM ECU housing. Only the stock (unmodified) OEM ECU connection to the wiring harness may be used. The allowance to modify the ECU in no way permits the addition of wiring, sensors, or piggybacked computers outside of the OEM ECU housing. The stock (unmodified) wiring harness must be used. Adjustable fuel pressure regulators are permitted."

    Unless you were able to fit the stock MAP sensor in the ECU, I don't see how you can get around the fact you are not allowed to add sensors. Also, I don't see how you can get a vacuum line into the ECU housing w/o modifying it.

    I wish tech inspections looked for cheating.


    ------------------
    George Roffe
    Houston, TX
    84 944 ITS car under construction
    92 ITS Sentra SE-R occasionally borrowed
    http://www.nissport.com

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    23

    Default

    I still have all the original ECU parts so if I ever start doing any actual competition I can revert back to it. I don't know why, but I have a feeling no one is really going to care about my ecu unless my driving skills + car = unfair advantage. I have a ways to go before that happens...

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Kensington, CT, USA
    Posts
    1,013

    Default

    Originally posted by Eric R287:
    I have a feeling no one is really going to care about my ecu unless my driving skills + car = unfair advantage.
    <--- ducking and covering


  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Black Rock, Ct
    Posts
    9,594

    Default

    <---- biting my tongue ....

    ------------------
    Jake Gulick
    CarriageHouse Motorsports
    ITA 57 RX-7
    New England Region
    [email protected]

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Bridgewater, MA USA
    Posts
    1,300

    Default

    Once again supporting my theory that the illegal cars are in the mid-pack trying to keep up with the ultra-prepped, well driven cars. No offense intended, just an observation.

    AB

    ------------------
    Andy Bettencourt
    06 ITS RX-7
    FlatOut Motorsports
    New England Region #188967

  16. #16
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    I could be wrong but I don't think that Eric is actually racing in IT with this set-up...

    K

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    52

    Default

    Is it legal to replace a standard O2 sensor with a wide band O2 sensor?

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    665

    Default

    Very interesting, I hadn't thought of putting the MAP sensor inside the box either. I know of several computer boxes (VW) that do have a vacuum connection to the intake (I think for ignition advance rather than fuel metering), so they already have a MAP-type sensor in the box I guess we could use that as the main sensor and just let the computer do whatever it wants with the extra MAF input. Now, do we have to use the stock injectors?

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Flagtown, NJ USA
    Posts
    6,334

    Default

    Originally posted by ITSRX7:
    Once again supporting my theory that the illegal cars are in the mid-pack trying to keep up with the ultra-prepped, well driven cars. No offense intended, just an observation.

    AB

    Andy,

    I'd like to hear the explanation of that one.

    ------------------
    MARRS #25 ITB Rabbit GTI (sold) | MARRS #25 HProd Rabbit
    SCCA 279608

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    23

    Default

    I am not doing any competition of any kind at this point. I'm still learning about racing and learning/working with my car; especially since it has been Winter. I probably won't do any competition this Summer, even.

    When I started building that ECU I realized I could more or less make it conform to the rules. So far I just have to deal with a vacuum hose that shouldn't be there. I've overcome a lot, though.

    Even if I cannot possibly find a way to make it work I will just have to switch back to the stock set up. I mostly built that ECU for the fun of it. It only cost about $200 to do and as far as I can tell performs like a $2000 set up.

    Pics of my ECU... I got this far! I passed the emissions test without a cat...
    http://b18c5.org/race/ecu/
    http://b18c5.org/race/ecu/10.jpg
    http://b18c5.org/race/ecu/passed.jpg

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •