Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: participation or points, what matter more to you in a championship?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,499

    Default participation or points, what matter more to you in a championship?

    Which do you prefer and why?

    Currently the championships in the Northeast you must complete a certain number of events to be eligible. But at the same time you also get drops so that it isn't thought of as a participation championship. For example: "NERRC CLASS CHAMPIONSHIPS*are decided by total points accumulated in a class per the current scoring rules. *Drivers must entered at least 50% of the races to be eligible"

    What are your thoughts and opinions?

    I will be honest I can see it both ways. I want to go to the banquet with the people I raced with all year not just the person that showed up a couple times and did real well but at the same time that person probably deserves it... not sure how I feel about it.

    Stephen
    Last edited by StephenB; 01-08-2014 at 09:54 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    145

    Default

    How could you truly judge a driver's skill or a car's performance if they just show up 2 times and win. Maybe they drive really well in the rain, or maybe their car is only really fast at one track. I think you need the minimum competition rule to set the season winners apart from the race winners. Let the guy who shows up most brag about being champ, and let the guy with the best motor (or skills, setup, etc.) brag about winning races.

    And just for the record, they should all come to the awards banquet for a beer.
    '77 Mazda RX-3
    NER SCCA E-Prod

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Houston-ish
    Posts
    932

    Default

    I agree on the participation thing.. It's one thing for a slower guy who tries harder and shows up all season with a mid-pack car vs. a local hotshoe in a retired World Challenge car that comes to 2 double-points races a season and walks away with the trophy..
    Houston Region
    STU Nissan 240SX
    EProd RX7

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt93SE View Post
    I agree on the participation thing.. It's one thing for a slower guy who tries harder and shows up all season with a mid-pack car vs. a local hotshoe in a retired World Challenge car that comes to 2 double-points races a season and walks away with the trophy..
    which is better?
    Jason Carroll - NER IT7 #07

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    472

    Default

    I guess it all depends on what one would consider a championship?
    Often the winners is the guy with best attendance!
    Not to long ago we also required and average car count per class.
    We would have a guy attend every race, be the only one in his class and not win the championship. Why did he not deserve the championship?
    Jerry
    NER South

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ner88 View Post
    championship. Why did he not deserve the championship?
    Because every Region has to decide what they consider a Champion. If one guy goes to all races and never competes against anyone, he is not a 'Champion' IMHO.

    I like the minimum participation. 50% of the races, or more commonly '1 more than half', is a way to drive participation and revenue of those with such goals but to also lend credibility to the Championship.

    If you want to 'boost' credibility even more, you need to have a points structure that gives you credit for people raced against and then set up a minimum threshold to be eligible for the title.
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Black Rock, Ct
    Posts
    9,594

    Default

    I've always liked a points structure that rewards you for beating people. The more people that are in the class for that race, the more points you get for winning.

    Then, the PTB can assign a minimum number of points to ensure reasonable participation levels, and also to make the winner actually be consistently better then his competition.

    Show up a bunch and win a championship is lame,
    And showing up but once or twice and winning ...does not a SERIES champion make.
    Jake Gulick


    CarriageHouse Motorsports
    for sale: 2003 Audi A4 Quattro, clean, serviced, dark green, auto, sunroof, tan leather with 75K miles.
    IT-7 #57 RX-7 race car
    Porsche 1973 911E street/fun car
    BMW 2003 M3 cab, sun car.
    GMC Sierra Tow Vehicle
    New England Region
    lateapex911(at)gmail(dot)com


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ridgefield, CT
    Posts
    151

    Default

    I liked how Pro-IT did the points when I ran it 2 years ago....even though I did finish out of the top 10.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Lagrangeville, NY
    Posts
    694

    Default

    I think points series are based on consistency and preparedness. I supoose that means that I agree with the minimum number requirement.
    Chris Raffaelli
    NER 24FP

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Posts
    17

    Default

    At our level just making it to a bunch of races takes a lot of determination and effort.

    One of the reasons people win or place high in championships is because the don't do stupid things that cause damage to their own car, or their own car and others. It's not like we have a back-up car waiting on the trailer.

    The fewer drops allowed the better. That being said boy am I pissed our friends are getting married on labor day weekend. Don't tell the missus but if I'm in the hunt for a podium she might be going stag!
    Hayes Lewis

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    NH, US
    Posts
    3,821

    Default

    I don't think a amature racing champion is someone who can afford to attend every race either... There needs to be at least 1 weekend equivelant of dropped races (NER mostly runs doubles or triples so you need two or three dropped races).

    I think the old NARRC series 5 or 6 + years ago had the best structure... A few drops, and bonus points for entering races as well as extra bonus points for running multiple tracks. That was a good enough "reward" for participation that made it so a champion most likely had to run at least 50% of the races. Also I am 100% in favor of a "double points" end of season championship, especially if is not on a holiday weekend!

    Raymond "not sure I agree but its a valad argument that If someone races three times as much as someone else and still has less points, they are not a champion, they just entered more races" Blethen
    RST Performance Racing
    www.rstperformance.com

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    472

    Default

    Do drivers and I mean the majority, follow or chase traveling series or do they just pick the best events or tracks they want to compete on.
    If I look at NARRC results it looks like very few are actually following the series compared to the overall number of entries.
    Look at pro it, how many guys ran just half the races? Do we consider that a success?
    Just askin!
    Jerry
    NER South

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ner88 View Post
    Do drivers and I mean the majority, follow or chase traveling series or do they just pick the best events or tracks they want to compete on?
    I chased a couple series, but now for me racing is all about the individual events and venues. - GA

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Frederick Maryland
    Posts
    109

    Default

    I completed every lap in the MARRS series except 1 this season (broken throttle linkage on the last lap of one race). I finished a distant second in two two-car races in Charlotte, and finished mid pack the majority of my other races. I did earn my first podium at a Summit Point race this season as well as a podium at VIR and Jersey, but they were all lowly attended races (by MARRS standards).

    Aside from the 3rd place at Summit, the only other race I was proud of this year was finishing 9th out of 27 on Labor Day. (Hayes, any friend of mine who gets married on Labor Day weekend is no longer a friend...pick a fight with them to get uninvited)

    While I am proud that I was one of only two cars that earned points in every MARRS sanction this season, I have mixed feelings about the fact that I earned second place for the season. I'll admit that I saw it as a possibilty about mid season and made it my goal at that point. However, the truth of the matter is that there was only a hand full of racers who actually attended enough races to be in consideration for the championship. The season champion was consistently above the rest of the field and had many wins and podium finishes...he clearly is and deserves to be the champion. However, if there was a driver who had more raw points than me but just didn't attend enough races to qualify for the award, I would not accept the award.

    Winning by default is less than ideal, but being given the win because someone else didn't beat you often enough even though they beat you often enough to earn more points is just wrong. There should be no minimum entry requirement. (IMHO)
    Steve Beckley
    Walkersville MD
    MARRS #87 ITB MR2

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Somewhere in the swamps of Jersey
    Posts
    399

    Default

    Similar to Steve, we competed in the MARRS series this year, and ran every race except the double in Charlotte. We completed every lap, and a quick glance at the results indicate that 15 of us were eligible for championship points, while averaging about 30 cars per race weekend. I finished fourth in points this year, my best finish in this series to date. I had two podiums and consistently finished in the top 5 all year.

    Does this mean anything to me? Damn straight it does. We've won championships before in a less well attended series and those have less value to me than this does because we worked harder for this result, a lot harder. Which was the goal when I chose to race there - improve my skills by upping the level of competition.

    I'm torn as to what my 2014 plans are. Do we chase the series again and try to improve, or is it destination track time? Frankly, my car, a WDCR SSM Miata is not going to be competitive elsewhere, so I'm not sure it will be as much fun, hard racing, so I don't know.
    Hero To The Momentum Challenged

  16. #16
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    CT/NY/NJ
    Posts
    1,157

    Default

    Participation should go a long way. Someone that makes every weekend and finishes 5th each time should win over someone who shows up twice and wins twice.

    Point distribution goes into this as does drops.

    Also, I'm concerned less about being in a class with competition and more about attendance. If a guy wants to be a champion in a class of one or three, let him, but he better make it to events. I'd say 75%.



    So don't give wins a huge point advantage. It isn't fair to those that show more and/or are more consistent. Also could cause more reckless acts that we can't afford...
    Chris Rallo "the kid"
    -- "wrenching and racing" -- "will race for food!" -- "Onward and Upward"

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Wandering the USA
    Posts
    1,341

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CRallo View Post
    Participation should go a long way......
    But not too far. My first year racing I was slower than molasses. You had to sign up for the divisional championship (which I did, but not a great many others - maybe 6 or 8 in my class), and you earned points relative to only those in the championship. So when I finished last at nearly every race, I still got 2nd or 3rd place points. Some races were double points (incentive to come to a single-race weekend). The points leader blew up his engine before the last race weekend, and #2 broke his car on the test day. That last race, my engine blew up on lap 10 of 18, earning me 1st place double points and the season championship while dripping oil on pit lane. What a farce. I valued a couple of hard-fought battles for last place more than that championship trophy.
    Marty Doane
    ITS RX-7 #13 (sold)
    2016 Winnebago Journey (home)

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •