Results 1 to 20 of 120

Thread: December 2013 Fastrack

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    774

    Default

    Did this note just make IT a legal national class that will allow you to qualify for the runoffs?

    Production
    1. #12279 (Philip Royle) Allow IT cars to run in Production in IT trim
    Thank you for your letter. Add 9.1.5.B5.: 5. Any Improved Touring car meeting all the requirements of ITCS 9.1.3 may compete in the Production class in which the same make, model and engine displacement car is classified. For Improved Touring cars competing in Production, the level of preparation and modifications will be as determined by ITCS 9.1.3 and not by PCS 9.1.5. This is intended to allow Improved Touring competitors to become more familiar with Production to assist them in determining whether to modify their cars to meet the requirements of PCS 9.1.5 and also to permit Improved Touring competitors to compete in all events open to Production cars.
    Track Speed Motorsports
    http://www.trackspeedmotorsports.com/

    Steven Ulbrik (engineer/crew/driver)
    [email protected]

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by quadzjr View Post
    Did this note just make IT a legal national class that will allow you to qualify for the runoffs?
    A great move, IMO.

    Of course, almost everybody with a 2L 4-cyl was able to do the same thing in STL for the last two years...now everyone else (well, those that have a corresponding car in Prod) can go to The Show.

    - GA

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    774

    Default

    the classificaton of the B18C5. Not quite sure why the 1" porting note has to be there. Is that not the rule for all STL builds?

    Also why more weight for the RWD? didn't a FWD qualify 3 and 4 at the runoffs?

    Good to see my request got through.
    Last edited by quadzjr; 11-14-2013 at 03:58 PM.
    Track Speed Motorsports
    http://www.trackspeedmotorsports.com/

    Steven Ulbrik (engineer/crew/driver)
    [email protected]

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by quadzjr View Post
    the classificaton of the B18C5. Not quite sure why the 1" porting note has to be there. Is that not the rule for all STL builds?
    Early (1997) Type R B18C5s were hand-ported from the factory. Subsequent B18C5s were subject to a CNC clearance process (something that typically may be part of a good IT/STL-level engine build anyway). The CRB would not approve (and I would not have supported) the engine if we allowed the factory porting in, since it would not be able to be scrutineered (what part was done by eunich ex-Ninja Shinto monks, and what was done by the competitor?)

    That note is an exclamation/clarification that the ported B18C5 engine will not pass scrutiny in STL. Any porting work, factory or otherwise, is prohibited. If you've got a hand-ported '97, you'll need to either get one that is not ported and/or start with a replacement casting (e.g., B16A/A2/A3 head).

    - Greg
    Last edited by Greg Amy; 11-14-2013 at 11:11 PM. Reason: Typos

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    ITS
    1. #11724 (Willie Phee) Classify Acura TSX in ITS
    The CRB requests member feedback for this question. Please submit letters to crbscca.com. Should the 04-08 Acura TSX remain as currently classified in ITR at 2760 lbs or be moved to ITS at a weight of 3175 lbs?


    ---

    Bring it on into ITS with 205 stock hp @ 3175 lbs and some 15" wheels. Hoosier guys will love it.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    1,391

    Default

    tGA - stupid (maybe?) question:

    STL now has weight penalties (understandably) for certain engines, RWD/AWD, etc... are these applied successively, or are they summed before applying the cumulative % penalty over the chart?
    e.g. the B18C5 has a 2% penalty. if RWD this would be chart *1.055*1.02 (1.0761)or *1.075?

    at 1800cc this is 2430 chart, 2615 as successive, 2612 as summed.

    I recognize it's 3lbs in this instance, but that's enough to get bounced at impound.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    192

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chip42 View Post
    tGA - stupid (maybe?) question:

    STL now has weight penalties (understandably) for certain engines, RWD/AWD, etc... are these applied successively, or are they summed before applying the cumulative % penalty over the chart?
    e.g. the B18C5 has a 2% penalty. if RWD this would be chart *1.055*1.02 (1.0761)or *1.075?

    at 1800cc this is 2430 chart, 2615 as successive, 2612 as summed.

    I recognize it's 3lbs in this instance, but that's enough to get bounced at impound.
    I believe any adjustments are each done as a percentage of base weight, then all added to the base weight.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    1,391

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by quadzjr View Post
    Good to see my request got through.
    now where the hell are we going to find one of those?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    774

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chip42 View Post
    now where the hell are we going to find one of those?
    I believe one is on a kart sitting right between two racecars at the moment.
    Track Speed Motorsports
    http://www.trackspeedmotorsports.com/

    Steven Ulbrik (engineer/crew/driver)
    [email protected]

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •